On 2/18/07, Jason J. W. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If by VI you are referring to VMware Infrastructure...you won't get
any support from VMware if you're using the iSCSI target on Solaris as
its not approved by them. Not that this is really a problem in my
experience as VMware tech suppo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kory Wheatley wrote:
> We created 10,000 zfs file systems with no data in them yet, and
> it seems after we did this our boot up process takes over an hour.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Current_implementation_issues
- --
Jesus Cea Avion
Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS?
I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba, but
I can't see anything about ZFS and ACLs.
Does anybody knows something?
Thank you
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zf
Hello Nicholas,
Monday, February 19, 2007, 11:31:50 AM, you wrote:
>
2. What is the recommended version of Opensolaris to use at the moment that has iscsi? Is there a stable-like branch or is it better to stay on the N-1 update?
3. Which leads to: coming from Debian, how easy is sy
Hello Dennis,
Monday, February 19, 2007, 12:20:49 AM, you wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Calvin Liu wrote:
>>
>>> I want to run command "rm Dis*" in a folder but mis-typed a space in it
>>> so it became "rm Dis *". Unfortunately I had pressed the return button
>>> before I noticed the mistake. So
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 04:07:25AM -0800, Rod wrote:
Hello,
> Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS?
>
> I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba,
> but I can't see anything about ZFS and ACLs.
>
> Does anybody knows something?
The code is in the svn repository
Something similar was proposed here before and IIRC someone even has a
working implementation. I don't know what happened to it.
That would be me. AFAIK, no one really wanted it. The problem that it
solves can be solved by putting snapshots in a cronjob.
--
Regards,
Jeremy
Op maandag 19 februari 2007 schreef Ivo De Decker:
> The code is in the svn repository:
> http://viewcvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/SAMBA_3_0_25/source/m
>odules/vfs_solarisacl.c?rev=21153&view=log
There is no ZFS ACL code in there, just UFS ACL stuff.
Onno
pgp9KJmivqAQw.pgp
Descrip
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:43:49PM +0100, Rodrigo Lería wrote:
> And when is going to be released 3.0.25 version?
The samba-technical mailing list has more info:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2007-February/051430.html
BTW this thread is also very interesting for ZFS users:
http
Leon Koll writes:
> An update:
>
> Not sure is it related to the fragmentation, but I can say that serious
> performance degradation in my NFS/ZFS benchmarks is a result of on-disk ZFS
> data layout.
> Read operations on directories (NFS3 readdirplus) are abnormally time
> consuming . T
dudekula mastan writes:
> If a write call attempted to write X bytes of data, and if writecall writes
> only x ( hwere x
> -Masthan
What kind of support do you want/need ?
-r
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://m
On 2/19/07, Rod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are now supported Samba Acls with ZFS?
I am looking for information on the release notes of 3.0.24 version Samba, but
I can't see anything about ZFS and ACLs.
Does anybody knows something?
It's not there yet. I spent some time looking at this a few
Here at my university, I recently started selling disk space to users
from a server with 4.5TB of space. They purchase space and I make
them their own volume, typically with compression on and it's then
exported via NFS to their servers/workstations. So far this has gone
quite well (with
Hi Nicholas,
Actually Virtual Iron, they have a nice system at the moment with live
migration of windows guest.
Ah. We looked at them for some Windows DR. They do have a nice product.
3. Which leads to: coming from Debian, how easy is system updates? I
remember with OpenBSD system updates u
On 2/20/07, Jason J. W. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah. We looked at them for some Windows DR. They do have a nice product.
Just waiting for them to get iscsi and vlan support. Supposely sometime in
the next couple months. Combined with zfs/iscsi it will make a very nice
small data
On 2/19/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5. there's no simple answer to this question as it greatly depends on
workload and data.
One thing you should keep in mind - Solaris *has* to boot in a 64bit
mode if you wan to
use all that memory as a cache for zfs, so old x86 32bi
Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote:
I believe that the word would have gone around already, Google engineers have
published a paper on disk reliability. It might supplement the ZFS FMA
integration and well - all the numerous debates on spares etc etc over here.
Good paper. They validate the old saying
Richard Elling wrote:
Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote:
I believe that the word would have gone around already, Google
engineers have published a paper on disk reliability. It might
supplement the ZFS FMA integration and well - all the numerous
debates on spares etc etc over here.
Good paper. They
18 matches
Mail list logo
