Re: [zfs-discuss] single memory allocation in the ZFS intent log

2006-10-04 Thread Erblichs
Casper Dik, Yes, I am familiar with Bonwick's slab allocators and tried it for wirespeed test of 64byte pieces for a 1Gb and then 100Mb Eths and lastly 10Mb Eth. My results were not encouraging. I assume it has improved over time. First, let me ask what ha

Re: [zfs-discuss] single memory allocation in the ZFS intent log

2006-10-04 Thread Casper . Dik
>Casper Dik, > > Yes, I am familiar with Bonwick's slab allocators and tried > it for wirespeed test of 64byte pieces for a 1Gb and then > 100Mb Eths and lastly 10Mb Eth. My results were not > encouraging. I assume it has improved over time. Nothing which tries to send 64

Re: [zfs-discuss] single memory allocation in the ZFS intent log

2006-10-04 Thread Frank Hofmann
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Erblichs wrote: Casper Dik, Yes, I am familiar with Bonwick's slab allocators and tried it for wirespeed test of 64byte pieces for a 1Gb and then 100Mb Eths and lastly 10Mb Eth. My results were not encouraging. I assume it has improved over ti

[zfs-discuss] Re: panic during recv

2006-10-04 Thread Gary Mitchell
Hi, Yes I have a lot of trouble with zfs send .. zfs recv too. (sol 10 6/06, SUNWzfsu 11.10.0,REV=2006.05.18.02.15). All too often there is panic of the host doing zfs recv. When this happens for a certain snapshot combination ie zfs send -i snapA snapB then it *always* happens for that combina

Re: [zfs-discuss] Questions of ZFS mount point and import Messages

2006-10-04 Thread Eric Schrock
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:22:24PM -0700, Tejung Ted Chiang wrote: > Hi Experts, > > I got two questions below. > > 1. [b]Is there any mechanism to protect the zfs mount point from being > renamed via command mv?[/b] Now I can use "mv" to rename the mount > point which has zfs filesystem currentl

[zfs-discuss] Overview (rollup) of recent activity on zfs-discuss

2006-10-04 Thread Eric Boutilier
For background on what this is, see: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=24416#24416 http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=25200#25200 = zfs-discuss 09/16 - 09/30 = Size of all threads during per

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: panic during recv

2006-10-04 Thread Mark Maybee
Hey Gary, Can we get access to your core files? -Mark Gary Mitchell wrote: Hi, Yes I have a lot of trouble with zfs send .. zfs recv too. (sol 10 6/06, SUNWzfsu 11.10.0,REV=2006.05.18.02.15). All too often there is panic of the host doing zfs recv. When this happens for a certain snapshot c

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: panic during recv

2006-10-04 Thread Matthew Ahrens
Gary Mitchell wrote: Hi, Yes I have a lot of trouble with zfs send .. zfs recv too. (sol 10 6/06, SUNWzfsu 11.10.0,REV=2006.05.18.02.15). All too often there is panic of the host doing zfs recv. This is certainly a bug! Can you point us to the crash dumps? Also it might be helpful to have

[zfs-discuss] q: zfs on das

2006-10-04 Thread ozan s. yigit
actually zfs going over vtrak 200i promise array with 12x250g as scsi das. i have each disk on its own volume; anyone have had any experience running zfs on top of such a setup? any links and/or notes on similar setup esp. performance & reliability would be helpful. [if noone has done this, i wil

[zfs-discuss] ZFS patches for S10 6/06

2006-10-04 Thread Andreas Sterbenz
Hi, I am about to create a mirrored pool on an amd64 machine running S10 6/06 (no other patches). I plan to install the latest kernel patch (118855). Are there any ZFS patches already out that I should also install first? (No, I don't want to move to Nevada, but I will upgrade to S10 11/06 as s

[zfs-discuss] Re: [request-sponsor] request sponsor for #4890717

2006-10-04 Thread Darren J Moffat
Jeremy Teo wrote: Hello, request sponsor for #4890717 want append-only files. I have a working prototype where the administrator can put a zfs fs into "append only" mode by setting the zfs "appendonly" property to "on" using zfs(1M). "append only" mode in this case means 1. Applications can o

Re: [zfs-discuss] Questions of ZFS mount point and import Messages

2006-10-04 Thread Wee Yeh Tan
On 10/5/06, Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:22:24PM -0700, Tejung Ted Chiang wrote: > 2. [b]How do we know the zpool by which systems is currently used?[/b] > "zpool import" command does not tell us the system id information. It > is hard to tell the dependencie

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: [request-sponsor] request sponsor for #4890717

2006-10-04 Thread Boyd Adamson
On 05/10/2006, at 8:10 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: Jeremy Teo wrote: Hello, request sponsor for #4890717 want append-only files. I have a working prototype where the administrator can put a zfs fs into "append only" mode by setting the zfs "appendonly" property to "on" using zfs(1M). "append only

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: [request-sponsor] request sponsor for #4890717

2006-10-04 Thread Mark Shellenbaum
Boyd Adamson wrote: On 05/10/2006, at 8:10 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: Jeremy Teo wrote: Hello, request sponsor for #4890717 want append-only files. I have a working prototype where the administrator can put a zfs fs into "append only" mode by setting the zfs "appendonly" property to "on" using

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: [request-sponsor] request sponsor for #4890717

2006-10-04 Thread Boyd Adamson
On 05/10/2006, at 11:28 AM, Mark Shellenbaum wrote: Boyd Adamson wrote: On 05/10/2006, at 8:10 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote: Jeremy Teo wrote: Hello, request sponsor for #4890717 want append-only files. I have a working prototype where the administrator can put a zfs fs into "append only" mode by

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS patches for S10 6/06

2006-10-04 Thread George Wilson
Andreas, The first ZFS patch will be released in the upcoming weeks. For now, the latest available bits are the ones from s10 6/06. Thanks, George Andreas Sterbenz wrote: Hi, I am about to create a mirrored pool on an amd64 machine running S10 6/06 (no other patches). I plan to install the