Hello Richard,
Thursday, August 31, 2006, 8:17:41 AM, you wrote:
RLH> Are both of you doing a umount/mount (or export/import, I guess) of the
RLH> source filesystem before both first and second test? Otherwise, there
might
RLH> still be a fair bit of cached data left over from the first test, w
Hi,
I'm a newbie at ZFS but I have some questions:
I have 3 drives.
The first one will be the primary/boot drive under UFS. The 2 others will
become a mirrored pool with ZFS.
Now, I have problem with the boot drive (hardware or software), so all the data
on my mirrored pool are ok?
How can I r
Hi all,
I am about to try ZFS on my 420 with (of course) Solaris 10 6/06
installed. My question is :
is there any storage compatibility list where to find which storage (in
my case a D1000) goes or not with ZFS?
cheers
___
zfs-discuss mailing lis
Hi,
> I have 3 drives.
> The first one will be the primary/boot drive under UFS. The 2 others will
> become a mirrored pool with ZFS.
> Now, I have problem with the boot drive (hardware or software), so all the
> data on my mirrored pool are ok?
> How can I restore this pool? When I create the p
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I am about to try ZFS on my 420 with (of course) Solaris 10 6/06
installed. My question is :
is there any storage compatibility list where to find which storage (in
my case a D1000) goes or not with ZFS?
If solaris see's the devi
James Dickens wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I am about to try ZFS on my 420 with (of course) Solaris 10 6/06
installed. My question is :
is there any storage compatibility list where to find which storage (in
my case a D1000) goes or not with ZFS?
If
Hi everyone,
Is there an easy way to find out which files has changed between two
snapshots? Currently I'm doing a
# rsync -arvn
and it creates a list. But rsync needs to go through the whole
filesystem and compare files. It would be nice if zfs would have this
option builtin.
Regards,
Nick
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:53:20PM -0700, Stefan Johansson wrote:
> Yes I did and it works ok enough for me.
>
> Would be nice to have vmware server for Solaris instead so I can run Solaris
> as the host and use zfs directly on the controllers.
You're not the only one who wants that. Maybe we s
Hi Nickus,
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 15:44 +0300, Niclas Sodergard wrote:
> Is there an easy way to find out which files has changed between two
> snapshots? Currently I'm doing a
>
> # rsync -arvn
>
> and it creates a list. But rsync needs to go through the whole
> filesystem and compare files.
On 8/31/06, Tim Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Nickus,
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 15:44 +0300, Niclas Sodergard wrote:
> Is there an easy way to find out which files has changed between two
> snapshots? Currently I'm doing a
>
> # rsync -arvn
>
> and it creates a list. But rsync needs to go
Thanks guys for your help.
Of course I have already put the D1000 in split so I can test the ZFS
mirroring and so on
cheers
Alfredo
James C. McPherson wrote:
James Dickens wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I am about to try ZFS on my 420 with (of
Please can anyone tell me how to handle with a LUN that is expanded (on a RAID
array or SAN storage)? and grow the filesystem without data-loss?
How does ZFS looks at the volume. In other words how can I grow the filesystem
after LUN expansion.
Do I need to format/type/autoconfigre/label on the s
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Sanjeev,
Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 3:26:52 PM, you wrote:
SB> Hi,
SB> We were trying out the "compression=on" feature of ZFS and were
SB> wondering if it would make
SB> sense to have ZFS do compression only on a certain kind of files (or
SB> rather the otherwa
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Sanjeev,
Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 3:26:52 PM, you wrote:
SB> Hi,
SB> We were trying out the "compression=on" feature of ZFS and were
SB> wondering if it would make
SB> sense to have ZFS do compression only on a certain kind of files
(or S
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 02:55:27PM +0100, Tim Foster wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 15:44 +0300, Niclas Sodergard wrote:
> > Is there an easy way to find out which files has changed between two
> > snapshots? Currently I'm doing a
>
> Nope, unfortunately not - you're interested in bug
> http://b
Thanks
Now, I don't have any worry to migrate to ZFS.
> > I have 3 drives.
> > The first one will be the primary/boot drive under
> UFS. The 2 others will become a mirrored pool with
> ZFS.
> > Now, I have problem with the boot drive (hardware
> or software), so all the data on my mirrored pool a
Theo Bongers wrote:
Please can anyone tell me how to handle with a LUN that is expanded (on a RAID
array or SAN storage)? and grow the filesystem without data-loss?
How does ZFS looks at the volume. In other words how can I grow the filesystem
after LUN expansion.
Do I need to format/type/autoc
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Richard,
Thursday, August 31, 2006, 8:17:41 AM, you wrote:
RLH> Are both of you doing a umount/mount (or export/import, I guess) of the
RLH> source filesystem before both first and second test? Otherwise, there
might
RLH> still be a fair bit of cached data left o
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:54:25AM -0700, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> Theo Bongers wrote:
> >Please can anyone tell me how to handle with a LUN that is expanded (on a
> >RAID array or SAN storage)? and grow the filesystem without data-loss?
> >How does ZFS looks at the volume. In other words how can I
Matthew Ahrens writes:
> Robert Milkowski wrote:
> > Hello Richard,
> >
> > Thursday, August 31, 2006, 8:17:41 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > RLH> Are both of you doing a umount/mount (or export/import, I guess) of
> > the
> > RLH> source filesystem before both first and second test? Otherwise
Roch wrote:
Matthew Ahrens writes:
> Robert Milkowski wrote:
> > IIRC unmounting ZFS file system won't flush its caches - you've got to
> > export entire pool.
>
> That's correct. And I did ensure that the data was not cached before
> each of my tests.
Matt ?
It seems to me that (at
John Beck wrote:
% zfs snapshot -r [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% zfs send space/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh newbox zfs recv -d space
% zfs send space/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ssh newbox zfs recv -d space
...
% zfs set mountpoint=/export/home space
% zfs set mountpoint=/usr/local space/local
% zfs set sharenfs=on
Ok, it's clear but doesn't give me any real solid ground. Maybe I tell more
about the hardware etc. It's a Sun X4200 running Solaris 10 X68 connecting
through fiberchannel to a StorageTek D280 RAID storage.
Maybe this makes the picture more complete.
Greets,
This message posted from opensol
Sanjeev Bagewadi wrote:
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Sanjeev,
Wednesday, August 30, 2006, 3:26:52 PM, you wrote:
SB> Hi,
SB> We were trying out the "compression=on" feature of ZFS and were
SB> wondering if it would make
SB> sense to have ZFS do compression only on a cer
Hi there...
I have solaris 5.10 update 2
I am trying get some iostats on a zpool, A little bit digging indicated thtat
I can do this by doing
libzfs_init and zpool_open and so on .. library calls.
But /lib/libzfs.so doesn't have the implementation of libzfs_int() , checked
with
/ucs/ccs/bin/nm
No, there is no documentation for libzfs. Your only bet is to look at
the opensolaris source and see how its being used. It's a
consolidation-private library, so it's not intended for public use.
That being said, if you're willing to go through some growing pains on
upgrade/patch, you're welcome
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# zfs snapshot export/zone/smb/share/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
internal error: unexpected error 16 at line 2302 of ../common/libzfs_dataset.c
I don't have this problem with other filesystems. There was one existing
snapshot which, after getting the above error, I deleted successfully
On August 31, 2006 4:00:52 PM -0700 Frank Cusack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# zfs snapshot export/zone/smb/share/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
internal error: unexpected error 16 at line 2302 of ../common/libzfs_dataset.c
I don't have this problem with other filesystems. There was one e
Frank Cusack wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]# zfs snapshot export/zone/smb/share/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
internal error: unexpected error 16 at line 2302 of
../common/libzfs_dataset.c
I don't have this problem with other filesystems. There was one existing
snapshot which, after getting the above error,
29 matches
Mail list logo
