Darren Reed wrote:
Hmmm, well, I suppose the same problem might apply to
encrypting data too...so maybe what I need is a zfs command
that will walk the filesystem's data tree, read in data and
write it back out according to the current data policy.
And if that file system is multiple terrabytes
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Darren Reed wrote:
Hmmm, well, I suppose the same problem might apply to
encrypting data too...so maybe what I need is a zfs command
that will walk the filesystem's data tree, read in data and
write it back out according to the current data policy.
And if that file sy
In RAID-Z, the width of the stripe can vary. For a small block (such as would
hold 512 bytes or less of file data), the stripe will be 1 data block and
either 1 or 2 parity blocks. So a full-stripe write will simply look like
either mirroring (RAIDZ1) or mirror plus one additional ECC block (RAI
Hi,
I just upgraded my home box to run Solaris 10 6/06 and converted my previous
filesytems over to ZFS, including /var/mail. Previously on S10 FCS I was
running dovecot mail server from blastwave.org without issue. On upgrading to
Update 2 I have found that the mail server hangs frequently.
The problem with encrypting in place is knowing when the system is
"safe", ie when it is done.
There are lots of things in this area that are possible but they
certainly aren't in the first deliveries for this project and with all
due respect no amount of pushing by anyone will change my mind
Oh - and by instant hang I mean I can reproduce it simply by rebooting,
enabling the dovecot service and then connecting to dovecot with thunderbird.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
ht
There are also a number of procmail processes with the following thread stacks
> 0t1611::pid2proc|::walk thread|::findstack -v
stack pointer for thread d8ae1a00: d3bcbbac
[ d3bcbbac 0xfe826b37() ]
d3bcbbc4 swtch+0x13e()
d3bcbbe8 cv_wait_sig+0x119(da58fb4c, d46a8680)
d3bcbc00 wait_for_lock+0x
Darren J Moffat wrote:
The problem with encrypting in place is knowing when the system is
"safe", ie when it is done.
There are lots of things in this area that are possible but they
certainly aren't in the first deliveries for this project and with all
due respect no amount of pushing by an
Quoth Thomas Maier-Komor on Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 04:19:11AM -0700:
> after switching over to zfs from ufs for my ~/ at home, I am a little
> bit disturbed by the noise the disks are making. To be more precise,
> I always have thunderbird and firefox running on my desktop and either
> or both seem t
martin wrote:
How could i monitor zfs ?
or the zpool activity ?
I want to know if anything wrong is going on.
If i could receive those warning by email, it would be great :)
For pool health:
# zpool status -x
all pools are healthy
#
To monitor activity, use 'zpool iostat 1' to monitor j
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 07:03, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> The current plan is that encryption must be turned on when the file
> system is created and can't be turned on later. This means that the
> zfs-crypto work depends on the RFE to set properties at file system
> creation time.
>
> You also wo
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 07:03, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> The current plan is that encryption must be turned on when the file
> system is created and can't be turned on later. This means that the
> zfs-crypto work depends on the RFE to set properties at file system
> creation time.
>
> You also wo
12 matches
Mail list logo
