Robert Milkowski writes:
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 5:00:07 PM, you wrote:
>
> JE> On Feb 6, 2007, at 06:55, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>
> >> Hello zfs-discuss,
> >>
> >> It looks like when zfs issues write cache flush commands se3510
> >> actually honors it. I
On Feb 6, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello eric,
Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 5:55:23 PM, you wrote:
IIRC Bill posted here some tie ago saying the problem with write
cache
on the arrays is being worked on.
ek> Yep, the bug is:
ek> 6462690 sd driver should set SYNC_NV bit
Robert Milkowski wrote On 02/06/07 11:43,:
Hello eric,
Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 5:55:23 PM, you wrote:
IIRC Bill posted here some tie ago saying the problem with write cache
on the arrays is being worked on.
ek> Yep, the bug is:
ek> 6462690 sd driver should set SYNC_NV bit when issuing
Hello eric,
Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 5:55:23 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> IIRC Bill posted here some tie ago saying the problem with write cache
>> on the arrays is being worked on.
ek> Yep, the bug is:
ek> 6462690 sd driver should set SYNC_NV bit when issuing SYNCHRONIZE
ek> CACHE to
ek> SBC-2 devi
On Feb 6, 2007, at 11:46, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Does anybody know how to tell se3510 not to honor write cache
flush
commands?
JE> I don't think you can .. DKIOCFLUSHWRITECACHE *should* tell the
array
JE> to flush the cache. Gauging from the amount of calls that zfs
makes to
JE>
IIRC Bill posted here some tie ago saying the problem with write cache
on the arrays is being worked on.
Yep, the bug is:
6462690 sd driver should set SYNC_NV bit when issuing SYNCHRONIZE
CACHE to
SBC-2 devices
We have a case going through PSARC that will make things works
correctly with
Hello Jonathan,
Tuesday, February 6, 2007, 5:00:07 PM, you wrote:
JE> On Feb 6, 2007, at 06:55, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Hello zfs-discuss,
>>
>> It looks like when zfs issues write cache flush commands se3510
>> actually honors it. I do not have right now spare se3510 to be 100%
>> sure
