Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + rsync, backup on steroids.

2006-08-30 Thread Darren Dunham
> > Why not make a snapshots on a production and then send incremental > > backups over net? Especially with a lot of files it should be MUCH > > faster than rsync. > > > because its a ZFS limited solution, if the source is not ZFS it won't > work, and i'm not sure how much faster incrementals woul

Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + rsync, backup on steroids.

2006-08-30 Thread James Dickens
On 8/30/06, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Jason, Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 9:35:13 PM, you wrote: JAH> On Aug 29, 2006, at 12:17 PM, James Dickens wrote: >> ZFS + rsync, backup on steroids. >> >> I was thinking today about backing up filesystems, and came up with an >> aweso

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] ZFS + rsync, backup on steroids.

2006-08-30 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Jason, Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 9:35:13 PM, you wrote: JAH> On Aug 29, 2006, at 12:17 PM, James Dickens wrote: >> ZFS + rsync, backup on steroids. >> >> I was thinking today about backing up filesystems, and came up with an >> awesome idea. Use the power of rsync and ZFS together. >> >> St