Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Re: 3510 HW RAID vs 3510 JBOD ZFS SOFTWARE RAID

2006-08-08 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Matthew, Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 7:25:17 PM, you wrote: MA> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 06:11:09PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: >> filebench/singlestreamread v440 >> >> 1. UFS, noatime, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2 >> 70MB/s >> >> 2. ZFS, atime=off, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2 (the same lun as

Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Re: 3510 HW RAID vs 3510 JBOD ZFS SOFTWARE RAID

2006-08-08 Thread Luke Lonergan
Robert, On 8/8/06 9:11 AM, "Robert Milkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. UFS, noatime, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2 > 70MB/s > 2. ZFS, atime=off, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2 (the same lun as in #1) > 87MB/s > 3. ZFS, atime=off, SW RAID-Z 6 disks, S10U2 > 130MB/s > 4. ZFS, atime=off, SW

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Re: 3510 HW RAID vs 3510 JBOD ZFS SOFTWARE RAID

2006-08-08 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Luke, Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 4:48:38 PM, you wrote: LL> Does snv44 have the ZFS fixes to the I/O scheduler, the ARC and the prefetch logic? LL> These are great results for random I/O, I wonder how the sequential I/O looks? LL> Of course you'll not get great results for sequential I/O