Hello Torrey,
Wednesday, August 9, 2006, 5:39:54 AM, you wrote:
TM> I read through the entire thread, I think, and have some comments.
TM> * There are still some "granny smith" to "Macintosh" comparisons
TM> going on. Different OS revs, it looks like different server types,
TM> a
Hello Torrey,
Wednesday, August 9, 2006, 4:59:08 AM, you wrote:
TM> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Hello Richard,
>>
>> Monday, August 7, 2006, 6:54:37 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> RE> Hi Robert, thanks for the data.
>> RE> Please clarify one thing for me.
>> RE> In the case of the HW raid, was there just on
Hello Richard,
Monday, August 7, 2006, 6:54:37 PM, you wrote:
RE> Hi Robert, thanks for the data.
RE> Please clarify one thing for me.
RE> In the case of the HW raid, was there just one LUN? Or was it 12 LUNs?
Just one lun which was build on 3510 from 12 luns in raid-1(0).
--
Best regards,
Hello Eric,
Monday, August 7, 2006, 5:53:38 PM, you wrote:
ES> Cool stuff, Robert. It'd be interesting to see some RAID-Z (single- and
ES> double-parity) benchmarks as well, but understandably this takes time
ES> ;-)
I intend to test raid-z. Not sure there'll be enough time for raidz2.
ES> Th
