Gary,
Thanks for the information these kernel type of patches.
David
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 11:33 -0600, Gary Mills wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:20:49AM -0800, David W. Smith wrote:
> >
> > Also, has anyone had problems installing 118855-36 with smpatch? I had
> > issues, and ended up ha
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:20:49AM -0800, David W. Smith wrote:
>
> Also, has anyone had problems installing 118855-36 with smpatch? I had
> issues, and ended up having to install it with patchadd.
Apparently, this patch, and probably all future kernel patches,
can't be applied with smpatch. Th
I'm pretty sure I have a service plan, but smpatch is not returning me
the 124205 patch. I'm currently running Solaris 10, update 2.
Also, has anyone had problems installing 118855-36 with smpatch? I had
issues, and ended up having to install it with patchadd.
David
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 08:5
On 2/5/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Casper,
Monday, February 5, 2007, 2:32:49 PM, you wrote:
>>Hello zfs-discuss,
>>
>> I've patched U2 system to 118855-36. Several zfs related bugs id
>> should be covered between -19 and -36 like HotSpare support.
>>
>> However desp
/* Warning : soapbox speech ahead */
>
> Something here is broken.
>
As a rule don't trust smpatch. Don't trust the freeware pca either.
Either one may or may not include patches that you don't need or they
may list patches you do need or seem to need but once you apply them
you find your s
