Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool vs df

2009-03-09 Thread Lars-Gunnar Persson
This was enlightening! Thanks a lot and sorry for the noise. Lars-Gunnar Persson On 9. mars. 2009, at 14.27, Tim wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Lars-Gunnar Persson > wrote: I've a interesting situation. I've created two pool now and one pool named "Data" and another named "raid5".

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool vs df

2009-03-09 Thread Lars-Gunnar Persson
Here is what zpool status reports: bash-3.00# zpool status pool: Data state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM Data ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5000402001FC442Cd0 ONLINE 0 0

Re: [zfs-discuss] zpool vs df

2009-03-09 Thread Tomas Ă–gren
On 09 March, 2009 - Lars-Gunnar Persson sent me these 1,1K bytes: > I've a interesting situation. I've created two pool now and one pool > named "Data" and another named "raid5". Check the details here: > > bash-3.00# zpool list > NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH A