On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Per Jorgensen wrote:
> is there a way i can get c9t8d0 out of the pool , or how do i get the pool
> back to optimal redundancy ?
It's not possible to remove vdevs right now. When the mythical
bp_rewrite shows up, then you can.
For now, the only thing you can do
On 05/27/10 09:16 PM, Per Jorgensen wrote:
thanks for the quick responses and yes the history show just what you said :(
is there a way i can get c9t8d0 out of the pool , or how do i get the pool back
to optimal redundancy ?
No, you will have to destroy the pool and start over. Or if tha
thanks for the quick responses and yes the history show just what you said :(
is there a way i can get c9t8d0 out of the pool , or how do i get the pool back
to optimal redundancy ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing li
On May 27, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Per Jorgensen wrote:
> I get the following output when i run a zpool status , but i am a little
> confused of why c9t8d0 is more "left align" then the rest of the disks in the
> pool , what does it mean ?
It means that is is another top-level vdev in your pool.
Ba
On 27 May, 2010 - Per Jorgensen sent me these 1,0K bytes:
> I get the following output when i run a zpool status , but i am a
> little confused of why c9t8d0 is more "left align" then the rest of
> the disks in the pool , what does it mean ?
Because someone forced it in without redundancy (or cre
