Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on SunFire X2100M2 with hybrid pools

2012-11-29 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov > > this is > the part I am not certain about - it is roughly as cheap to READ the > gzip-9 datasets as it is to read lzjb (in terms of CPU decompression). Nope. I know LZJB is not

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on SunFire X2100M2 with hybrid pools

2012-11-28 Thread Jim Klimov
Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote: There are very few situations where (gzip) option is better than the default lzjb. Well, for the most part my question regarded the slowness (or lack of) gzip DEcompression as compared to lz* algorithms. If there are files and data

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on SunFire X2100M2 with hybrid pools

2012-11-28 Thread Ian Collins
Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote: From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov I really hope someone better versed in compression - like Saso - would chime in to say whether gzip-9 vs. lzjb (or lz4)

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on SunFire X2100M2 with hybrid pools

2012-11-28 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov > > I really hope someone better versed in compression - like Saso - > would chime in to say whether gzip-9 vs. lzjb (or lz4) sucks in > terms of read-speeds from the pools. My HDD-b

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on SunFire X2100M2 with hybrid pools

2012-11-27 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > Now there are multiple configurations for this. > Some using Linux (roof fs on a RAID10, /home on > RAID 1) or zfs. Now zfs on Linux probably wouldn't > do hybrid zfs pools (would it?) Sure it does. You can even use the whole disk as zfs, with

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on SunFire X2100M2 with hybrid pools

2012-11-27 Thread Jim Klimov
Now that I thought of it some more, a follow-up is due on my advices: 1) While the best practices do(did) dictate to set up zoneroots in rpool, this is certainly not required - and I maintain lots of systems which store zones in separate data pools. This minimizes write-impact on rpools

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on SunFire X2100M2 with hybrid pools

2012-11-27 Thread Jim Klimov
Performance-wise, I think you should go for mirrors/raid10, and separate the pools (i.e. rpool mirror on SSD and data mirror on HDDs). If you have 4 SSDs, you might mirror the other couple for zoneroots or some databases in datasets delegated into zones, for example. Don't use dedup. Carve out som

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on SunFire X2100M2 with hybrid pools

2012-11-27 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:12:43PM +, Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote: > > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Eugen Leitl > > > > can I make e.g. LSI SAS3442E > > directly do SSD caching (it s

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs on SunFire X2100M2 with hybrid pools

2012-11-27 Thread Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Eugen Leitl > > can I make e.g. LSI SAS3442E > directly do SSD caching (it says something about CacheCade, > but I'm not sure it's an OS-side driver thing), as it > is supposed to boost IOPS? U