Moore, Joe wrote:
> Richard Elling wrote:
>
>> There are known issues with the Marvell drivers in X4500s. You will
>> want to pay attention to the release notes, SRDBs, InfoDocs,
>> and SunAlerts
>> for the platform.
>> http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Sy
>> stems/Su
Richard Elling wrote:
> There are known issues with the Marvell drivers in X4500s. You will
> want to pay attention to the release notes, SRDBs, InfoDocs,
> and SunAlerts
> for the platform.
> http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Sy
> stems/SunFireX4500/SunFireX4500
>
> Yo
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:38:21PM -0700, Neal Pollack wrote:
>
> As of build 94, it does not automatically bring the disk online.
> I replaced a failed disk on an x4500 today running Nevada build 94, and
> still
> had to manually issue
>
> # cfgadm -c configure sata1/3
> # zpool replace tank cx
Lida Horn wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
There are known issues with the Marvell drivers in X4500s. You will
want to pay attention to the release notes, SRDBs, InfoDocs, and SunAlerts
for the platform.
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/SunFireX4500/SunFireX450
Richard Elling wrote:
> There are known issues with the Marvell drivers in X4500s. You will
> want to pay attention to the release notes, SRDBs, InfoDocs, and SunAlerts
> for the platform.
> http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/SunFireX4500/SunFireX4500
>
> You will
Since we were drowning, we decided to go ahead and reboot with my
guesses, even though I have not heard and expert opinions on the
changes. (Also, 3 mins was way under estimated. It takes 12 minutes to
reboot our x4500).
The new values are: (original)
set bufhwm_pct=10(2%)
set m
> Yup, and the Supermicro card uses the "Marvell
> Hercules-2 88SX6081 (Rev. C0) SATA Host Controller",
> which is part of the series supported by the same
> driver:
> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5177/marvell88sx
> 7d?a=view. I've seen the Supermicro card mentioned
> in connection with t
> Ross,
>
> The X4500 uses 6x Marvell 88SX SATA controllers for
> its internal disks. They are not Supermicro
> controllers. The new X4540 uses an LSI chipset
> instead of the Marvell chipset.
>
> --Brett
Yup, and the Supermicro card uses the "Marvell Hercules-2 88SX6081 (Rev. C0)
SATA Host C
Ross,
The X4500 uses 6x Marvell 88SX SATA controllers for its internal disks. They
are not Supermicro controllers. The new X4540 uses an LSI chipset instead of
the Marvell chipset.
--Brett
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss
There are known issues with the Marvell drivers in X4500s. You will
want to pay attention to the release notes, SRDBs, InfoDocs, and SunAlerts
for the platform.
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/SunFireX4500/SunFireX4500
You will want to especially pay attention
Have any of you guys reported this to Sun? A quick search of the bug database
doesn't bring up anything that appears related to sata drives and hanging or
hot swapping.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discu
2008 7:40 AM
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] x4500 performance tuning.
We have had a disk fail in the the existing x4500 and it sure froze the
whole server. I believe it is an OS problem which (should have) been
fixed in a version newer than we have. If you want me to tes
We have had a disk fail in the the existing x4500 and it sure froze the
whole server. I believe it is an OS problem which (should have) been
fixed in a version newer than we have. If you want me to test it on the
new x4500 because it runs Sol10 508 I can do.
Ross wrote:
> Hi Jorgen,
>
> This
Hi Jorgen,
This isn't an answer to your problem I'm afraid, but a request for you to do a
test when you get your new x4500.
Could you try pulling a SATA drive to see if the system hangs? I'm finding
Solaris just locks up if I pull a drive connected to the Supermicro
AOC-SAT2-MV8 card, and I w
>> SunOS x4500-01.unix 5.11 snv_70b i86pc i386 i86pc
> That's a very old release, have you considered upgrading?
> Ian.
>
It was the absolute latest version available when we received the x4500,
and now it is live and supporting a large number of customers. However,
the 2nd unit will arrive nex
Jorgen Lundman writes:
>
> We are having slow performance with the UFS volumes on the x4500. They
> are slow even on the local server. Which makes me think it is (for once)
> not NFS related.
>
>
> Current settings:
>
> SunOS x4500-01.unix 5.11 snv_70b i86pc i386 i86pc
>
That's a very ol
16 matches
Mail list logo
