Re: [zfs-discuss] x4500 panic report.

2008-07-11 Thread Jorgen Lundman
Today we had another panic, at least it was during work time :) Just a shame the 999GB ufs takes 80+ mins to fsck. (Yes, it is mounted 'logging'). panic[cpu3]/thread=ff001e70dc80: free: freeing free block, dev:0xb60024, block:13144, ino:1737885, fs:/export /saba1 ff001e70d50

Re: [zfs-discuss] x4500 panic report.

2008-07-06 Thread Jorgen Lundman
> I don't know, I'm not a UFS expert (heck, I'm not an expert > on _anything_). Have you investigated putting your paying > customers onto zfs and managing quotas with zfs properties > instead of ufs? Yep, we spent about 6 weeks during the trial period of the x4500 to try to find a way for ZFS to

Re: [zfs-discuss] x4500 panic report.

2008-07-06 Thread James C. McPherson
Jorgen Lundman wrote: > > Since the panic stack only ever goes through ufs, you should > log a call with Sun support. > > We do have support, but they only speak Japanese, and I'm still quite > poor at it. But I have started the process of having it translated and > passed along to the next per

Re: [zfs-discuss] x4500 panic report.

2008-07-06 Thread Jorgen Lundman
> Since the panic stack only ever goes through ufs, you should log a call with Sun support. We do have support, but they only speak Japanese, and I'm still quite poor at it. But I have started the process of having it translated and passed along to the next person. It is always fun to see what

Re: [zfs-discuss] x4500 panic report.

2008-07-06 Thread James C. McPherson
Jorgen Lundman wrote: > On Saturday the X4500 system paniced, and rebooted. For some reason the > /export/saba1 UFS partition was corrupt, and needed "fsck". This is why > it did not come back online. /export/saba1 is mounted "logging,noatime", > so fsck should never (-ish) be needed. > > SunOS