Re: [zfs-discuss] removing a separate zil device

2008-01-09 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Bill, BM> the sad reality comes when a reboot or export of the pool occurs BM> and there is then no way to re-import the pool without re-inserting BM> the missing ZIL device, and if the missing ZIL device is no longer BM> available, the pool is inaccessible ... it's too late now to do a re

Re: [zfs-discuss] removing a separate zil device

2008-01-09 Thread Bill Moloney
Thanks to Kyle, richard and Eric In dealing with this problem, I realize now that I could have saved myself a lot of grief if I had simply used the replace command and substituted some other drive for my flash drive before I removed it I think that this point is critical for anyone who finds t

Re: [zfs-discuss] removing a separate zil device

2008-01-07 Thread Eric Schrock
The problem is that the ZIL device is treated just like another toplevel vdev. As part of the import process, we find all vdevs and assemble the config, and verify that the sum of all vdev GUIDs match the expected sum. Now, each vdev only stores enough configuration to keep track of the toplevel

Re: [zfs-discuss] removing a separate zil device

2008-01-07 Thread Richard Elling
Perhaps this is being tracked as 6538021? http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6538021 -- richard Bill Moloney wrote: > This is a re-post of this issue ... I didn't get any replies to the previous > post of 12/27 ... I'm hoping someone is back from holiday > who may have some insight in

Re: [zfs-discuss] removing a separate zil device

2008-01-07 Thread Kyle McDonald
Bill Moloney wrote: > Taking it out does not impact the immediate function of the pool, > but the inability to re-import it after this event is a significant issue. > Has > anyone found a workaround for this problem ? I have data in a pool that > I cannot import because the separate zil is no lon