On 10/05/2010 16:52, Peter Tribble wrote:
For zfs, zpool iostat has some utility, but I find fsstat to be pretty useful.
iostat, zpool iostat, fsstat - all of them are very useful and allow you
to monitor I/O on different levels.
And of course dtrace io, fsinfo and syscall providers are
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> It seems that if using zfs, the usual tools like vmstat, sar, top etc are
> quite worthless, since zfs i/o load is not reported as iowait etc. Are there
> any plans to rewrite the old performance monitoring tools or the z
On May 10, 2010, at 12:16 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> - "Michael Schuster" skrev:
>
>> On 10.05.10 08:57, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> It seems that if using zfs, the usual tools like vmstat, sar, top
>> etc are quite worthless, since zfs i/o load is not reported as
- "Michael Schuster" skrev:
> On 10.05.10 08:57, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > It seems that if using zfs, the usual tools like vmstat, sar, top
> etc are quite worthless, since zfs i/o load is not reported as iowait
> etc. Are there any plans to rewrite the old performance m
On 10.05.10 08:57, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Hi all
It seems that if using zfs, the usual tools like vmstat, sar, top etc are quite
worthless, since zfs i/o load is not reported as iowait etc. Are there any
plans to rewrite the old performance monitoring tools or the zfs parts to allow
for
