Thanks to Brandon High <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and I am sorry for my thickness
and having an assumption I could not export a faulted pool. After
failure, I exported then imported with zpool cmd and it came back.
Thanks!
Weldon
If memory serves me right, sometime around Wednesday, Weldon S Godfre
Thanks Miles Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for pointing out the confusion in my
previous post.
I'm sorry, the 4th line was meant to read if enclosure 0 comes up by
itself (the one that was da0-da11 origionally), it is okay (not encl 1)
Trying to be clearer: the confusing point for me is that I c
I meant to add that the devs come up Failure (corrupted data) when the the
enclosure that was enclosure 1 when the RAID10 was created.
Again, if enclosure 1 is up by itself, it comes up
When both enclosures come up, no matter which is 0 and which is 1, it
comes up, with no failed/corrupted dri
No, I was trying to simulate cabinate failure to see if it can recover.
Thanks!
If memory serves me right, sometime around 12:13am, Brandon High told me:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Weldon S Godfrey 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My question is (finally, sorry)...it appears ZFS doesn't car
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Weldon S Godfrey 3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My question is (finally, sorry)...it appears ZFS doesn't care if I flip
> the sides of the mirror around but always, the enclosure that was
> origionally encl 1 (orig set up da12-da23) will never come up by
> itself...
