Re: [zfs-discuss] iscsi/comstar performance

2009-10-19 Thread Jim Dunham
Frank Middleton wrote: On 10/13/09 18:35, Albert Chin wrote: Maybe this will help: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/storage-discuss/2009-September/007118.html Well, it does seem to explain the scrub problem. I think it might also explain the slow boot and startup problem - the VM only

Re: [zfs-discuss] iscsi/comstar performance

2009-10-18 Thread Frank Middleton
On 10/13/09 18:35, Albert Chin wrote: Maybe this will help: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/storage-discuss/2009-September/007118.html Well, it does seem to explain the scrub problem. I think it might also explain the slow boot and startup problem - the VM only has 564M available, an

Re: [zfs-discuss] iscsi/comstar performance

2009-10-13 Thread Albert Chin
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:00:35PM -0400, Frank Middleton wrote: > After a recent upgrade to b124, decided to switch to COMSTAR for iscsi > targets for VirtualBox hosted on AMD64 Fedora C10. Both target and > initiator are running zfs under b124. This combination seems > unbelievably slow compared