Re: [zfs-discuss] eWeek: corrupt file brought down FAA's antiquated IT system

2008-09-06 Thread Sean Sprague
Tim, > And let this be a lesson to all of you not to write code that is too > good. If you can't sell an "update" (patch) every 6 months, you'll be > out of business as well :D Updates are generally functionality enhancements, which may well be chargeable; whereas patches are problem-fixes; w

Re: [zfs-discuss] eWeek: corrupt file brought down FAA's antiquated IT system

2008-08-28 Thread Tim
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Bob Friesenhahn < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Toby Thain wrote: > > > What goes unremarked here is how the original system has coped > > reliably for decades of (one guesses) geometrically growing load. > > Fantastic engineering from a company

Re: [zfs-discuss] eWeek: corrupt file brought down FAA's antiquated IT system

2008-08-28 Thread Keith Bierman
On Aug 28, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > The old FORTRAN code > either had to be ported or new code written from scratch. Assuming it WAS written in FORTRAN there is no reason to believe it wouldn't just compile with a modern Fortran compiler. I've often run codes originally w

Re: [zfs-discuss] eWeek: corrupt file brought down FAA's antiquated IT system

2008-08-28 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Toby Thain wrote: > > "two 20-year-old redundant mainframe configurations ... that > apparently are hanging on for dear life until reinforcements arrive > in the form of a new, state-of-the-art system this winter." > > And we all know that 'new, state-of-the-art systems' are si

Re: [zfs-discuss] eWeek: corrupt file brought down FAA's antiquated IT system

2008-08-28 Thread Wade . Stuart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/28/2008 09:00:23 AM: > > On 28-Aug-08, at 10:54 AM, Toby Thain wrote: > > > > > On 28-Aug-08, at 10:11 AM, Richard Elling wrote: > > > >> It is rare to see this sort of "CNN Moment" attributed to file > >> corruption. > >> http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Infrastructure/Co

Re: [zfs-discuss] eWeek: corrupt file brought down FAA's antiquated IT system

2008-08-28 Thread Toby Thain
On 28-Aug-08, at 10:54 AM, Toby Thain wrote: > > On 28-Aug-08, at 10:11 AM, Richard Elling wrote: > >> It is rare to see this sort of "CNN Moment" attributed to file >> corruption. >> http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Infrastructure/Corrupt-File-Brought- >> Down-FAAs-Antiquated-IT-System/?kc=EWKNLNAV08

Re: [zfs-discuss] eWeek: corrupt file brought down FAA's antiquated IT system

2008-08-28 Thread Toby Thain
On 28-Aug-08, at 10:11 AM, Richard Elling wrote: > It is rare to see this sort of "CNN Moment" attributed to file > corruption. > http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Infrastructure/Corrupt-File-Brought- > Down-FAAs-Antiquated-IT-System/?kc=EWKNLNAV08282008STR4 > "two 20-year-old redundant mainframe c

Re: [zfs-discuss] eWeek: corrupt file brought down FAA's antiquated IT system

2008-08-28 Thread Gary Mills
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 06:11:06AM -0700, Richard Elling wrote: > It is rare to see this sort of "CNN Moment" attributed to file corruption. > http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Infrastructure/Corrupt-File-Brought-Down-FAAs-Antiquated-IT-System/?kc=EWKNLNAV08282008STR4 `file corruption' takes the blame a