Re: [zfs-discuss] cutting up a SSD for read/log use...

2009-06-22 Thread Richard Elling
comment below... Erik Trimble wrote: Richard Elling wrote: Erik Trimble wrote: I just looked at pricing for the higher-end MLC devices, and it looks like I'm better off getting a single drive of 2X capacity than two with X capacity. Leaving aside the issue that by using 2 drives I get 2 x

Re: [zfs-discuss] cutting up a SSD for read/log use...

2009-06-21 Thread Erik Trimble
James Lever wrote: Hi Erik, On 22/06/2009, at 1:15 PM, Erik Trimble wrote: I just looked at pricing for the higher-end MLC devices, and it looks like I'm better off getting a single drive of 2X capacity than two with X capacity. Leaving aside the issue that by using 2 drives I get 2 x 3.0G

Re: [zfs-discuss] cutting up a SSD for read/log use...

2009-06-21 Thread Erik Trimble
Richard Elling wrote: Erik Trimble wrote: I just looked at pricing for the higher-end MLC devices, and it looks like I'm better off getting a single drive of 2X capacity than two with X capacity. Leaving aside the issue that by using 2 drives I get 2 x 3.0Gbps SATA performance instead of 1

Re: [zfs-discuss] cutting up a SSD for read/log use...

2009-06-21 Thread Richard Elling
Erik Trimble wrote: I just looked at pricing for the higher-end MLC devices, and it looks like I'm better off getting a single drive of 2X capacity than two with X capacity. Leaving aside the issue that by using 2 drives I get 2 x 3.0Gbps SATA performance instead of 1 x 3.0Gbps, are there p

Re: [zfs-discuss] cutting up a SSD for read/log use...

2009-06-21 Thread James Lever
Hi Erik, On 22/06/2009, at 1:15 PM, Erik Trimble wrote: I just looked at pricing for the higher-end MLC devices, and it looks like I'm better off getting a single drive of 2X capacity than two with X capacity. Leaving aside the issue that by using 2 drives I get 2 x 3.0Gbps SATA perform