Re: [zfs-discuss] c5->c9 device name change prevents beadm activate

2010-06-24 Thread Lori Alt
On 06/24/10 03:27 AM, Brian Nitz wrote: Lori, In my case what may have caused the problem is that after a previous upgrade failed, I used this zfs send/recv procedure to give me (what I thought was) a sane rpool: http://blogs.sun.com/migi/entry/broken_opensolaris_never Is it possible that a

Re: [zfs-discuss] c5->c9 device name change prevents beadm activate

2010-06-24 Thread Brian Nitz
Lori, In my case what may have caused the problem is that after a previous upgrade failed, I used this zfs send/recv procedure to give me (what I thought was) a sane rpool: http://blogs.sun.com/migi/entry/broken_opensolaris_never Is it possible that a zfs recv of a root pool contains the dev

Re: [zfs-discuss] c5->c9 device name change prevents beadm activate

2010-06-23 Thread Lori Alt
Cindy Swearingen wrote: On 06/23/10 10:40, Evan Layton wrote: On 6/23/10 4:29 AM, Brian Nitz wrote: I saw a problem while upgrading from build 140 to 141 where beadm activate {build141BE} failed because installgrub failed: # BE_PRINT_ERR=true beadm activate opensolarismigi-4 be_do_installgru

Re: [zfs-discuss] c5->c9 device name change prevents beadm activate

2010-06-23 Thread Cindy Swearingen
On 06/23/10 10:40, Evan Layton wrote: On 6/23/10 4:29 AM, Brian Nitz wrote: I saw a problem while upgrading from build 140 to 141 where beadm activate {build141BE} failed because installgrub failed: # BE_PRINT_ERR=true beadm activate opensolarismigi-4 be_do_installgrub: installgrub failed for

Re: [zfs-discuss] c5->c9 device name change prevents beadm activate

2010-06-23 Thread Evan Layton
On 6/23/10 4:29 AM, Brian Nitz wrote: I saw a problem while upgrading from build 140 to 141 where beadm activate {build141BE} failed because installgrub failed: # BE_PRINT_ERR=true beadm activate opensolarismigi-4 be_do_installgrub: installgrub failed for device c5t0d0s0. Unable to activate open