> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cook
>
> I would think a flag to allow you to automatically continue with a disclaimer
> might be warranted (default behavior obviously requiring human input).
This already exists. It's c
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
>
> > > Also keep in mind that if you have an SLOG (ZIL on a separate
> > > device), and then lose this SLOG (disk crash etc), you will probably
> > > lose the pool. So if
On Jul 30, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Richard Elling
> wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>> - Opprinnelig melding -
>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
>>> wrote:
>> Also keep in mind t
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Richard Elling
wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>
> - Opprinnelig melding -
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
>
> wrote:
>
> Also keep in mind that if you have an SLOG (ZIL on a separate
>
> device
On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> - Opprinnelig melding -
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
>> wrote:
> Also keep in mind that if you have an SLOG (ZIL on a separate
> device), and then lose this SLOG (disk crash etc), you will
>
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Should OI/Illumos be able to boot cleanly without manual action with
the SLOG devices gone?
If this is allowed, then data may be unnecessarily lost.
When the drives are not all in one chassis, then it is not uncommon
for one chassis to not co
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
wrote:
> On 151a2, man page just says 'use this or that mountpoint' with import -m,
> but the fact was zpool refused to import the pool at boot when 2 SLOG devices
> (mirrored) and 10 L2ARC devices were offline. Should OI/Illumos be able to
- Opprinnelig melding -
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> wrote:
> >> > Also keep in mind that if you have an SLOG (ZIL on a separate
> >> > device), and then lose this SLOG (disk crash etc), you will
> >> > probably
> >> > lose the pool. So if you want/need SLOG,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
wrote:
>> > Also keep in mind that if you have an SLOG (ZIL on a separate
>> > device), and then lose this SLOG (disk crash etc), you will probably
>> > lose the pool. So if you want/need SLOG, you probably want two of
>> > them in a mirror…
>
> > Also keep in mind that if you have an SLOG (ZIL on a separate
> > device), and then lose this SLOG (disk crash etc), you will probably
> > lose the pool. So if you want/need SLOG, you probably want two of
> > them in a mirror…
>
> That's only true on older versions of ZFS. ZFSv19 (or 20?) incl
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
wrote:
>> > For several times now I've seen statements on this list implying
>> > that a dedicated ZIL/SLOG device catching sync writes for the log,
>> > also allows for more streamlined writes to the pool during normal
>> > healthy TXG syncs
> > For several times now I've seen statements on this list implying
> > that a dedicated ZIL/SLOG device catching sync writes for the log,
> > also allows for more streamlined writes to the pool during normal
> > healthy TXG syncs, than is the case with the default ZIL located
> > within the pool
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov
>
> Thanks... but doesn't your description imply that the sync writes
> would always be written twice?
That is correct, regardless of whether you have slog or not. In the case of
On Jul 29, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> 2012-07-30 0:40, opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris пишет:
>>> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
>>> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov
>>>
>>>For several times now I've seen statements on this list
2012-07-30 0:40, opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris пишет:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov
For several times now I've seen statements on this list implying
that a dedicated ZIL/SLOG device catching sync writes
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Jim Klimov
>
>For several times now I've seen statements on this list implying
> that a dedicated ZIL/SLOG device catching sync writes for the log,
> also allows for more streamlined writes
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Jim Klimov wrote:
For several times now I've seen statements on this list implying
that a dedicated ZIL/SLOG device catching sync writes for the log,
also allows for more streamlined writes to the pool during normal
healthy TXG syncs, than is the case with the default ZIL l
On 07/29/2012 06:01 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> 2012-07-29 19:50, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
>> On 07/29/2012 04:07 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
>>>For several times now I've seen statements on this list implying
>>> that a dedicated ZIL/SLOG device catching sync writes for the log,
>>> also allows for more str
2012-07-29 19:50, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
On 07/29/2012 04:07 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
For several times now I've seen statements on this list implying
that a dedicated ZIL/SLOG device catching sync writes for the log,
also allows for more streamlined writes to the pool during normal
healthy TXG sy
On 07/29/2012 04:07 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> Hello, list
Hi Jim,
> For several times now I've seen statements on this list implying
> that a dedicated ZIL/SLOG device catching sync writes for the log,
> also allows for more streamlined writes to the pool during normal
> healthy TXG syncs, than i
On Jul 29, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Jim Klimov wrote:
> Hello, list
>
> For several times now I've seen statements on this list implying
> that a dedicated ZIL/SLOG device catching sync writes for the log,
> also allows for more streamlined writes to the pool during normal
> healthy TXG syncs, than is
21 matches
Mail list logo
