Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS panic in space_map.c line 125

2007-09-18 Thread Gino
> Tomas Ögren wrote: > > On 18 September, 2007 - Gino sent me these 0,3K > bytes: > > > >> Hello, > >> upgrade to snv_60 or later if you care about your > data :) > > > > If there are known serious data loss bug fixes that > have gone into > > snv60+, but not into s10u4, then I would like to > te

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS panic in space_map.c line 125

2007-09-18 Thread Victor Latushkin
Tomas Ögren wrote: > On 18 September, 2007 - Gino sent me these 0,3K bytes: > >> Hello, >> upgrade to snv_60 or later if you care about your data :) > > If there are known serious data loss bug fixes that have gone into > snv60+, but not into s10u4, then I would like to tell Sun to "backport" > t

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS panic in space_map.c line 125

2007-09-18 Thread Tomas Ögren
On 18 September, 2007 - Gino sent me these 0,3K bytes: > Hello, > upgrade to snv_60 or later if you care about your data :) If there are known serious data loss bug fixes that have gone into snv60+, but not into s10u4, then I would like to tell Sun to "backport" those into s10u4 if they care abou

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS panic in space_map.c line 125

2007-09-18 Thread Gino
Hello, upgrade to snv_60 or later if you care about your data :) Gino This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS panic in space_map.c line 125

2007-09-17 Thread Robin Guo
Hi Matty, From the stack I saw, that is 6454482. But this defect has been marked as 'Not reproducible', I have no idea about how to recover from it, but looks like new update will not hit this issue. Matty wrote: > One of our Solaris 10 update 3 servers paniced today with the following error: