Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS issues and the choice of platform

2011-05-26 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 08:20:03AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Carosone > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > > > The systems where we h

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS issues and the choice of platform

2011-05-26 Thread LaoTsao
Any support contract is worth some things In your case you will need 1. Server contract 2. Array contract or part of server 3. Solaris/solaris express support There is no free lunch, if you want support you will need to pay $ or your xxx is on the line My 2c Sent from my iPad Hung-Sheng Tsao (

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS issues and the choice of platform

2011-05-26 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Carosone > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > > The systems where we have had issues, are two 100TB boxes, with some > > 160TB "raw" storage each,

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS issues and the choice of platform

2011-05-25 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:59:19PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > The systems where we have had issues, are two 100TB boxes, with some > 160TB "raw" storage each, so licensing this with nexentastor will be > rather expensive. What would you suggest? Will a solaris express > install give us go