On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Robert Thurlow wrote:
> Linux has had it for a longer time. Is this not what you
> see on current Linux?
>
All of my linux clients are using nfs3. CentOS 5 had trouble with nfs4, and
the ancient version of debian I'm running doesn't support it at all.
-B
--
B
Damon Atkins wrote:
NFSv4 has a concept of a root of the overall exported filesystem
(Pseudofilesystem).
FileHandle 0 in terms of Linux it is setting fsid=0 when exporting.
Which would explain why someone said Linux (NFSv4) automounts an exported
filesystem under another exported filesystem
NFSv4 has a concept of a root of the overall exported filesystem
(Pseudofilesystem).
FileHandle 0 in terms of Linux it is setting fsid=0 when exporting.
Which would explain why someone said Linux (NFSv4) automounts an exported
filesystem under another exported filesystem
ie mount servername:/
Stefan Walk wrote:
On debian linux (lenny), the nfs4 client automatically mounts subshares,
but the nfs3 client doesn't (May not be right in all cases, just my
experience).
NFSv3 has no way to do this in the protocol, so this is as
designed (and the same as current Solaris/OpenSolaris).
Rob
On 25 Mar 2010, at 11:58, Robert Thurlow wrote:
Brandon High wrote:
If you mount server:/nfs on another host, it will not include
server:/nfs/foo1 or server:/nfs/foo2. Some nfs clients (notably
Solaris's) will attempt to mount the foo1 & foo2 datasets
automatically, so it looks like you'
Brandon High wrote:
If you mount server:/nfs on another host, it will not include
server:/nfs/foo1 or server:/nfs/foo2. Some nfs clients (notably
Solaris's) will attempt to mount the foo1 & foo2 datasets automatically,
so it looks like you've exported everything under server:/nfs. Linux
clien
Chris Dunbar wrote:
Let's say I create the ZFS file system tank/nfs and
share that over NFS. Then I create the ZFS file systems tank/nfs/foo1 and
tank/nfs/foo2. I want to manage snapshots independently for foo1 and foo2,
but I would like to be able to access both from the single NFS share for
ta
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Chris Dunbar wrote:
> Thank you for the explanation. It looks like I will have to share out each
> file system. I was trying to keep the number of shares manageable, but it
> sounds like that won't work.
>
Thanks to inheritance, it's easier than you think when yo
Brandon,
Thank you for the explanation. It looks like I will have to share out each file
system. I was trying to keep the number of shares manageable, but it sounds
like that won't work.
Regards,
Chris
On Mar 24, 2010, at 9:36 PM, Brandon High wrote:
> 2010/3/24 Chris Dunbar
> I have boxed m
2010/3/24 Chris Dunbar
> I have boxed myself into a mental corner and need some help getting out. I
> am confused about working with ZFS file systems. Here is a simple example of
> what has me confused: Let's say I create the ZFS file system tank/nfs and
> share that over NFS. Then I create the Z
10 matches
Mail list logo