On Dec 13, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Richard Elling
wrote:
On Dec 12, 2009, at 12:53 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
Do I understand correctly if I read this as: OpenSolaris is able to
switch between systems without reinstalling? Just a zfs import -f
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Richard Elling
wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2009, at 12:53 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
>
>> Do I understand correctly if I read this as: OpenSolaris is able to
>> switch between systems without reinstalling? Just a zfs import -f and
>> everything runs? Wow, that would be an
It may not be supported, but you can swap drives between systems and it
does work very well.
I did a Solaris 8 -> Solaris 10 migration on ~200 systems in 2007. I
had a set of systems that I jumpstarted, then, once the system was
built, I pulled the drives and placed them in the new system.
On Dec 12, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Mattias Pantzare wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 18:08, Richard Elling > wrote:
On Dec 12, 2009, at 12:53 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:22 +, Moritz Willers wrote:
The host identity had - of course - changed with the new
motherboard
an
On 12-Dec-09, at 1:32 PM, Mattias Pantzare wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 18:08, Richard Elling
wrote:
On Dec 12, 2009, at 12:53 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:22 +, Moritz Willers wrote:
The host identity had - of course - changed with the new
motherboard
and
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 18:08, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2009, at 12:53 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:22 +, Moritz Willers wrote:
>>
>>> The host identity had - of course - changed with the new motherboard
>>> and it no longer recognised the zpool as its own
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, dick hoogendijk wrote:
Because, like I said, I always understood it was very difficult to
change disks to another system and run the installed solaris version on
that new hardware.
A place where I used to work had several thousand Sun workstations and
I noticed that if a
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 09:08 -0800, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2009, at 12:53 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:22 +, Moritz Willers wrote:
> >
> >> The host identity had - of course - changed with the new motherboard
> >> and it no longer recognised the zpool as
On Dec 12, 2009, at 12:53 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:22 +, Moritz Willers wrote:
The host identity had - of course - changed with the new motherboard
and it no longer recognised the zpool as its own. 'zpool import -f
rpool' to take ownership, reboot and it all wor
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 00:22 +, Moritz Willers wrote:
> The host identity had - of course - changed with the new motherboard
> and it no longer recognised the zpool as its own. 'zpool import -f
> rpool' to take ownership, reboot and it all worked no problem (which
> was amazing in itself as
10 matches
Mail list logo
