dh wrote:
> Hello eschrock,
>
> I'm a newbe on solaris, would you tell me how I can get/install build 89 of
> nevada?
>
> Fabrice.
Hi Fabrice,
I think a good place to start is http://www.opensolaris.org/os/newbies/ - I
don't know whether they give you access to build 89 yet, but you can
cert
Hello eschrock,
I'm a newbe on solaris, would you tell me how I can get/install build 89 of
nevada?
Fabrice.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listi
Hi Rick,
OK, thanks for clarifying.
As, it seems there's different devices with (1) mixed speed NICs and (2) mixed
category cabling being used in your setup, I will simplify things by saying
that if you want to get much faster speeds then I think you'll need to ensure
you (1) use at least Cat.
> So just to verify, you never managed to get more than
> 10 MBytes/sec across the link due to the network only
> giving you a 100 Mbps connection?
Hi Simon,
I'll try to clear this up. Sorry for the confusion.
The server the Solaris M2N-E is replacing had 2 NICs. When I removed the
physical box
Hi Rick,
So just to verify, you never managed to get more than 10 MBytes/sec across the
link due to the network only giving you a 100 Mbps connection?
Simon
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolar
> If you're doing anything with CIFS and performance,
> you'll want this
> fix:
>
> 6686647 smbsrv scalability impacted by memory
> management issues
>
> Which was putback into build 89 of nevada.
>
> - Eric
Thank you Eric. This is the second time someone has mentioned this to me. I
imagine it
FYI -
If you're doing anything with CIFS and performance, you'll want this
fix:
6686647 smbsrv scalability impacted by memory management issues
Which was putback into build 89 of nevada.
- Eric
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 09:46:04AM -0700, Rick wrote:
> Recently I've installed SXCE nv86 for the fi
Hi Rick,
I have the same problem as you. (sorry for my english)
I have installed the same OS on a gigabyte mother board. I wanted to make a NAS
with the nice ZFS.
First I tried the new smb kernel implementation: file navigation (on windows)
and streaming were too slow. File transfer was accepta
Rick,
Glad it worked ;-)
Now if I were you, I would not upgrade the BIOS unless you really want/need to.
I look forward to seeing your revised speed test data for reads and writes with
the gigabit network speed working correctly. I think it should make a little
difference -- I'm guessing you'l
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Simon Breden wrote:
> The obvious thing that is wrong is the network being recognised as
> 100Mbps and not 1000. Hopefully, the read/write speeds will fix
> themselves once the network problem is fixed.
>
> As it's the same cable you had working previously at 1000Mbps on
>
Simon,
> The obvious thing that is wrong is the network being
> recognised as 100Mbps and not 1000. Hopefully, the
> read/write speeds will fix themselves once the
> network problem is fixed.
You are absolutely correct. My troubleshooting skills for things of this nature
are pretty bad. I should
Hey, hi Rick!
The obvious thing that is wrong is the network being recognised as 100Mbps and
not 1000. Hopefully, the read/write speeds will fix themselves once the network
problem is fixed.
As it's the same cable you had working previously at 1000Mbps on your other
computer and the same switc
> Rick, I have the same motherboard on my backup
> machine and got 48MBytes/sec sustained on a 650GB
> transfer (but that was using iSCSI), so I suggest two
> things:
>
> 1. Make sure you are using the latest stable -- i.e.
> not beta, BIOS update. You can use a USB thumbdrive
> to install it, and
Rick, I have the same motherboard on my backup machine and got 48MBytes/sec
sustained on a 650GB transfer (but that was using iSCSI), so I suggest two
things:
1. Make sure you are using the latest stable -- i.e. not beta, BIOS update. You
can use a USB thumbdrive to install it, and can save the
> I didn't cross post the following, it was sent only to the cifs discuss list:
> nge. Onboard nvidia nforce 570 Ultra MCP onboard gigabit nic for the Asus
> M2N-E board.
>
> nge: [ID 801725 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0: Using FIXED interrupt type
> mac: [ID 469746 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 registered
>
-snip-
> > What I'm doing is mounting the smb share with WinXP
> and pulling data from the ZFS mirror pool at 2.3MiB/s
> across the network. Writing to the same share from
> the WinXP host I get a fairly consistent 342KiB/s
> speed.
-snip-
> What performance are you getting with transfers over
>
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 09:46 -0700, Rick wrote:
> Recently I've installed SXCE nv86 for the first time in hopes of getting rid
> of my linux file server and using Solaris and ZFS for my new file server.
> After setting up a simple ZFS mirror of 2 disks, I enabled smb and set about
> moving over a
17 matches
Mail list logo
