It solved my problems, the difference was really huge. The onboard realtek
8111B chip could do about 40Mt/sec file transfer over CIFS which looked good,
but in reality the io speed was very bad: backups to the CIFS share took ages,
copying files to using ftp and unzipping files located in the ci
> Then I went and bought an Intel PCI Gigabit Ethernet card for 25€ which seems
> to have solved the problem.
Is this really the case? If so that is an important clue to finding out why
virtualized opensolaris performance is so poor. I tried every network adapter
in virtualbox and vmware and
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 13:16, Juho Mäkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then I went and bought an Intel PCI Gigabit Ethernet card for 25€ which seems
> to have solved the problem. I still need to do some testing though to verify.
Glad to hear it.
>> Is hardware checksum offloading enabled on eith
> A few things to try: put in a different ethernet card
> if you have one,
> on one or more ends. Realtek works, but I've been
> unimpressed with
> their performance in the past. An Intel x1 pci
> express card will only
> run you around $40, and I've seen much better results
> with them.
I fir
> It looks pretty lively from my browser :-)
Now that you showed up ;)
In my case it is OpenSolaris in VirtualBox so I was expecting more cooperation,
or at least people striving to make them cooperate.
But like you said, this is likely just a case of OpenSolaris being optimized
for big iron a
MC wrote:
> I mentioned this too, but on the performance forum:
> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=64907&tstart=0
>
> Unfortunately the performance forum has tumbleweeds blowing through it, so
> that was probably the wrong place to complain. Not that people don't care
> abou
I mentioned this too, but on the performance forum:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=64907&tstart=0
Unfortunately the performance forum has tumbleweeds blowing through it, so that
was probably the wrong place to complain. Not that people don't care about
performance, but th
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 16:34, Juho Mäkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's bonnie++ output with default settings:
> Version 1.03 --Sequential Output-- --Sequential Input-
> --Random-
>-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine
Here's bonnie++ output with default settings:
Version 1.03 --Sequential Output-- --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
MachineSize K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
sonas
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 14:47, Juho Mäkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Streaming video or even audio from the exported shares to windows xp gives a
> laggy performance. Seeking the video can take ages, audio (playing mp3 with
> winamp from the cifs share) stops from time to time and also the vid
10 matches
Mail list logo
