On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
> I have a pool (on an X4540 running S10U8) in which a disk failed, and the
> hot spare kicked in. That's perfect. I'm happy.
>
> Then a second disk fails.
>
> Now, I've replaced the first failed disk, and it's resilvered and I have my
> hot spa
On 03/31/10 10:54 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
I have a pool (on an X4540 running S10U8) in which a disk failed, and the
hot spare kicked in. That's perfect. I'm happy.
Then a second
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
I have a pool (on an X4540 running S10U8) in which a disk failed, and the
hot spare kicked in. That's perfect. I'm happy.
Then a second disk fails.
Now, I've replaced the first
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Eric Schrock wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Peter Tribble wrote:
>
>> I have a pool (on an X4540 running S10U8) in which a disk failed, and the
>> hot spare kicked in. That's perfect. I'm happy.
>>
>> Then a second disk fails.
>>
>> Now, I've replaced the
I have a pool (on an X4540 running S10U8) in which a disk failed, and the
hot spare kicked in. That's perfect. I'm happy.
Then a second disk fails.
Now, I've replaced the first failed disk, and it's resilvered and I have my
hot spare back.
But: why hasn't it used the spare to cover the other f
On 03/31/10 10:39 AM, Peter Tribble wrote:
I have a pool (on an X4540 running S10U8) in which a disk failed, and the
hot spare kicked in. That's perfect. I'm happy.
Then a second disk fails.
Now, I've replaced the first failed disk, and it's resilvered and I have my
hot spare back.
But: why ha
