Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS usb keys

2007-06-27 Thread Matthew Ahrens
William D. Hathaway wrote: It would be really handy if whoever was responsible for the message at: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-A5 could add data about which zpool versions are supported at specific OS/patch releases. Did you look at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/N W

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS usb keys

2007-06-27 Thread Mike Lee
I had a similar situation between x86 and SPARC, version number. When I created the pool on the LOWER rev machine, it was seen by the HIGHER rev machine. This was a USB HDD, not a stick. I can now move the drive between boxes. HTH, Mike Dick Davies wrote: Thanks to everyone for the sanity ch

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS usb keys

2007-06-27 Thread Dick Davies
Thanks to everyone for the sanity check - I think it's a platform issue, but not an endian one. The stick was originally DOS-formatted, and the zpool was built on the first fdisk partition. So Sparcs aren't seeing it, but the x86/x64 boxes are. -- Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS usb keys

2007-06-27 Thread Mark J Musante
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, [UTF-8] Jürgen Keil wrote: > Yep, I just tried it, and it refuses to "zpool import" the newer pool, > telling me about the incompatible version. So I guess the pool format > isn't the correct explanation for the Dick Davies' (number9) problem. Have you tried creating the poo