>Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
>> Similarly, the bulk of the synchronous I/O done during the import of SMF
>> manifests early in boot after an install or upgrade are wasted effort..
>
>I've done hundreds of installs. Empirically, my observation is that
>the SMF manifest import scales well with processor
Roch - PAE wrote:
Right on. And you might want to capture this in a blog for
reference. The permalink will be quite useful.
such as:
http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/entry/zil_disable
?
We did have a use case for zil synchronicity which was a
big user controlled transaction :
turn
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
Similarly, the bulk of the synchronous I/O done during the import of SMF
manifests early in boot after an install or upgrade are wasted effort..
I've done hundreds of installs. Empirically, my observation is that
the SMF manifest import scales well with processors. In o
Anton B. Rang wrote:
> The ZIL is a necessary part of ZFS. Just because the ZFS file structure will
> be consistent after a system crash even with the ZIL disabled does not mean
> that disabling it is safe!
Is there a list of battery-backed RAID controllers supported by Solaris x86
somewhere? Doe
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 11:33 +0100, Roch - PAE wrote:
> We did have a use case for zil synchronicity which was a
> big user controlled transaction :
>
> turn zil off
> do tons of thing to the filesystem.
> big sync
> turn zil back on
Yep. The bulk of the "heavy lifting" o
Right on. And you might want to capture this in a blog for
reference. The permalink will be quite useful.
We did have a use case for zil synchronicity which was a
big user controlled transaction :
turn zil off
do tons of thing to the filesystem.
big sync
turn zil
Kory Wheatley wrote:
The Luns will be on separate "SPA" controllers"not on all
the same controller, so that's why I thought if we split
our data on different disks and ZFS Storage Pools we would
get better IO performance. Correct?
The way to think about it is that, in general, for best
perfo
Are you looking purely for performance, or for the added reliability that ZFS
can give you?
If the latter, then you would want to configure across multiple LUNs in either
a mirrored or RAID configuration. This does require sacrificing some storage in
exchange for the peace of mind that any “si
