On Apr 23, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Andy Lubel wrote:
What I'm saying is ZFS doesn't play nice with NFS in all the
scenarios I could think of:
-Single second disk in a v210 (sun72g) write cache on and off =
~1/3 the performance of UFS when writing files using dd over an NFS
mount using the s
- PAE
Sent: Mon 4/23/2007 5:32 AM
To: Leon Koll
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)
Leon Koll writes:
> Welcome to the club, Andy...
>
> I tried several times to attract the attention of the community to the
> dram
Leon Koll writes:
> Welcome to the club, Andy...
>
> I tried several times to attract the attention of the community to the
> dramatic performance degradation (about 3 times) of NFZ/ZFS vs. ZFS/UFS
> combination - without any result : href="http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messa
or only Suns?
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Erblichs
> > Sent: Sun 4/22/2007 4:50 AM
> > To: Leon Koll
> > Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6
Sent: Sun 4/22/2007 4:50 AM
To: Leon Koll
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)
Leon Koll,
As a knowldegeable outsider I can say something.
The benchbark (SFS) page specifies NFSv3,v2 support, so I question
whethe
@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS+NFS on storedge 6120 (sun t4)
Leon Koll,
As a knowldegeable outsider I can say something.
The benchbark (SFS) page specifies NFSv3,v2 support, so I question
whether you ra n NFSv4. I would expect a major change in
Leon Koll,
As a knowldegeable outsider I can say something.
The benchbark (SFS) page specifies NFSv3,v2 support, so I question
whether you ra n NFSv4. I would expect a major change in
performance just to version 4 NFS version and ZFS.
The benchmark seems
