Bill Moloney wrote:
Thanks for the input Darren, but I'm still confused about DNODE
atomicity ... it's difficult to imagine that a change that is made
anyplace in the zpool would require copy operations all the way back
up to the uberblock
This is in fact what happens. However, these changes
> Thanks for the input Darren, but I'm still confused about DNODE
> atomicity ... it's difficult to imagine that a change that is made
> anyplace in the zpool would require copy operations all the way back
> up to the uberblock (e.g. if some single file in one of many file
> systems in a zpool was
