On 12/09/06, Celso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the great things about zfs, is that it protects not just against
mechanical failure, but against silent data corruption. Having this available
to laptop owners seems to me to be important to making zfs even more attractive.
I'm not arguing
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Anton B. Rang wrote:
reformatted
> >True - I'm a laptop user myself. But as I said, I'd assume the whole disk
> >would fail (it does in my experience).
Usually a laptop disk suffers a mechanical failure - and the failure rate
is a lot higher than disks in a fixed lo
Anton B. Rang wrote:
The biggest problem I see with this is one of observability, if not all
of the data is encrypted yet what should the encryption property say ?
If it says encryption is on then the admin might think the data is
"safe", but if it says it is off that isn't the truth either bec
