Hi all,
Customer has another questions. I'm resending :
I guess since the zones we are working with
are running /acting as Oracle 10 database
servers, the 100% memory usage prstat is not
accurate. Also, from the text below it seems
that rcapd is not the way to go to segregate
memory in zones and
Hello All,
Here is customer's reply:
I guess since the zones we are working with
are running /acting as Oracle 10 database
servers, the 100% memory usage prstat is not
accurate. Also, from the text below it seems
that rcapd is not the way to go to segregate
memory in zones and to wait for LDOMs w
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On 8/11/06, Irma Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ZONEID NPROC SIZE RSS MEMORY TIME CPU ZONE
15 188 169G 163G 100% 0:46:00 48% fmtest
0 54 708M 175M 0.1% 2:23:40 0.1% global
12 27 112M 51M 0.0% 0:02:48 0.0% fmprod
4 27 281M 66M 0.0% 0:14:13 0.0% fmstage
Questions?
Does the
On 8/11/06, Irma Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ZONEID NPROC SIZE RSS MEMORY TIME CPU ZONE
15 188 169G 163G 100% 0:46:00 48% fmtest
0 54 708M 175M 0.1% 2:23:40 0.1% global
12 27 112M 51M 0.0% 0:02:48 0.0% fmprod
4 27 281M 66M 0.0% 0:14:13 0.0% fmstage
Questions?
Does the 100% memory usage on
Follow-up: it looks to me like prstat displays the portion of the system's
physical memory in use by the processes in that zone.
How much memory does that system have? Something seems amiss, as a V490 can hold
up to 32GB, and prstat is showing 163GB of physical memory just for fmtest.
Irma
Irma Garcia wrote:
Hi All,
Sun Fire V440
Solaris 10
Solaris Resource Manager
Customer wrote the following:
I have a v490 with 4 zones:
tsunami:/#->zoneadm list -iv
ID NAME STATUS PATH
0 global running /
4 fmstage running /fmstage
12 fmprod running /fmprod
15 fmtest running /fmtest
fmtest has
