Btw, in case that gets lost between my devil's advocatism:
A happy +1 from me for the proposal !
FrankH.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Jim Dunham wrote:
Frank,
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Torrey McMahon wrote:
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thank you very much for the heads up. Unfortunately, we need the
write-cache enabled for the application I was thinking of combining
this with. Sounds like SNDR and ZFS
Frank,
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Torrey McMahon wrote:
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thank you very much for the heads up. Unfortunately, we need the
write-cache enabled for the application I was thinking of combining
this with. Sounds like SNDR and ZFS need some more soak time together
befor
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Torrey McMahon wrote:
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thank you very much for the heads up. Unfortunately, we need the
write-cache enabled for the application I was thinking of combining
this with. Sounds like SNDR and ZFS need some more soak time together
before you ca
My two (everyman's) cents - could something like this be modeled after
MySQL replication or even something like DRBD (drbd.org) ? Seems like
possibly the same idea.
On 1/26/07, Jim Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Project Overview:
...
___
zfs-discus
Jonathan Edwards wrote:
On Feb 2, 2007, at 15:35, Nicolas Williams wrote:
Unlike traditional journalling replication, a continuous ZFS send/recv
scheme could deal with resource constraints by taking a snapshot and
throttling replication until resources become available again.
Replication throt
On Feb 2, 2007, at 15:35, Nicolas Williams wrote:
Unlike traditional journalling replication, a continuous ZFS send/recv
scheme could deal with resource constraints by taking a snapshot and
throttling replication until resources become available again.
Replication throttling would mean losing s
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:17:17PM -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
Nicolas Williams wrote:
But a continuous zfs send/recv would be cool too. In fact, I think ZFS
tightly integrated with SNDR wouldn't be that much different from a
continuous zfs send/recv.
Ev
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:17:17PM -0500, Torrey McMahon wrote:
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
> >But a continuous zfs send/recv would be cool too. In fact, I think ZFS
> >tightly integrated with SNDR wouldn't be that much different from a
> >continuous zfs send/recv.
>
> Even better with snapshots, a
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 05:15:28PM -0700, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Could the replication engine eventually be integrated more tightly
with ZFS? That would be slick alternative to send/recv.
But a continuous zfs send/recv would be cool too. In fact, I think Z
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 05:15:28PM -0700, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> Could the replication engine eventually be integrated more tightly
> with ZFS? That would be slick alternative to send/recv.
But a continuous zfs send/recv would be cool too. In fact, I think ZFS
tightly integrated with SNDR
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thank you very much for the heads up. Unfortunately, we need the
write-cache enabled for the application I was thinking of combining
this with. Sounds like SNDR and ZFS need some more soak time together
before you can use both to their full potential together?
Hi Jim,
Thank you very much for the heads up. Unfortunately, we need the
write-cache enabled for the application I was thinking of combining
this with. Sounds like SNDR and ZFS need some more soak time together
before you can use both to their full potential together?
Best Regards,
Jason
On 1/2
Jason,
Thank you for the detailed explanation. It is very helpful to
understand the issue. Is anyone successfully using SNDR with ZFS yet?
Of the opportunities I've been involved with the answer is yes, but so
far I've not seen SNDR with ZFS in a production environment, but that
does not mean
Thank you for the detailed explanation. It is very helpful to
understand the issue. Is anyone successfully using SNDR with ZFS yet?
Best Regards,
Jason
On 1/26/07, Jim Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
> Could the replication engine eventually be integrated more tigh
Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
Could the replication engine eventually be integrated more tightly
with ZFS?
Not it in the present form. The architecture and implementation of
Availability Suite is driven off block-based replication at the device
level (/dev/rdsk/...), something that allows the pro
Could the replication engine eventually be integrated more tightly
with ZFS? That would be slick alternative to send/recv.
Best Regards,
Jason
On 1/26/07, Jim Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the community
17 matches
Mail list logo
