> Do you have sata Native Command Queuing enabled? I've experienced delays of
> just under one minute when NCQ is enabled, that do not occur when NCQ is
> disabled. If all threads comprising the parallel zfs destroy hang for a
> minute, I bet its the hang that causes "no more processes". I h
Do you have sata Native Command Queuing enabled? I've experienced delays of
just under one minute when NCQ is enabled, that do not occur when NCQ is
disabled. If all threads comprising the parallel zfs destroy hang for a
minute, I bet its the hang that causes "no more processes". I have open
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:40:41AM -0700, David Bustos wrote:
> Quoth Stuart Anderson on Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700:
> > Running 102 parallel "zfs destroy -r" commands on an X4500 running S10U4 has
> > resulted in "No more processes" errors in existing login shells for several
> > minute
Quoth Stuart Anderson on Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0700:
> Running 102 parallel "zfs destroy -r" commands on an X4500 running S10U4 has
> resulted in "No more processes" errors in existing login shells for several
> minutes of time, but then fork() calls started working again. However, none
