Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll just add, but not for Mac OS X. It was way back in Finder 7
> > days,
> > when they used to ship A/UX. (That was where I cut my unix teeth.)
>
> I was actually thinking more of NEXTSTEP, certainly a generation
> beyond A/UX; and OS X, a generati
On 6/8/07, Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 08/06/07, BVK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> File based CDDL license seems like a right choice to a company like
> Apple. My only worry is, Apple never works in open, so their
> improvements may never get back into the community.
Apple have giv
On 6/8/07, Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, BVK wrote:
> File based CDDL license seems like a right choice to a company like
> Apple. My only worry is, Apple never works in open, so their
> improvements may never get back into the community.
But that can't happen (to fil
On Jun 8, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Rich Teer wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, BVK wrote:
File based CDDL license seems like a right choice to a company like
Apple. My only worry is, Apple never works in open, so their
improvements may never get back into the community.
But that can't happen (to files t
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, BVK wrote:
> File based CDDL license seems like a right choice to a company like
> Apple. My only worry is, Apple never works in open, so their
> improvements may never get back into the community.
But that can't happen (to files that Apple modifies at least): the
CDDL dictate
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Toby Thain wrote:
On 8-Jun-07, at 3:13 AM, BVK wrote:
On 6/8/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When should we expect Solaris kernel under OS X? 10.6? 10.7? :-)
I think its quite possible. I believe, very soon they will ditch their
Mach based (?) BSD and switch
On 8-Jun-07, at 3:13 AM, BVK wrote:
On 6/8/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When should we expect Solaris kernel under OS X? 10.6? 10.7? :-)
I think its quite possible. I believe, very soon they will ditch their
Mach based (?) BSD and switch to solaris.
Many think this would be
On 08/06/07, BVK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/8/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When should we expect Solaris kernel under OS X? 10.6? 10.7? :-)
>
I think its quite possible. I believe, very soon they will ditch their
Mach based (?) BSD and switch to solaris.
I think that's ex
On 6/8/07, Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When should we expect Solaris kernel under OS X? 10.6? 10.7? :-)
I think its quite possible. I believe, very soon they will ditch their
Mach based (?) BSD and switch to solaris.
File based CDDL license seems like a right choice to a company li
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 08:38:10PM -0300, Toby Thain wrote:
> When should we expect Solaris kernel under OS X? 10.6? 10.7? :-)
I'm sure Jonathan will be announcing that soon. ;-)
Adam
--
Adam Leventhal, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/ahl
__
On 7-Jun-07, at 8:13 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On June 7, 2007 6:37:29 PM -0300 Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 7-Jun-07, at 6:28 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On June 7, 2007 6:21:34 PM -0300 Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In general, IMHO this will be good for ZFS: Apple won't s
On June 7, 2007 6:37:29 PM -0300 Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7-Jun-07, at 6:28 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On June 7, 2007 6:21:34 PM -0300 Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In general, IMHO this will be good for ZFS: Apple won't ship until
it's
shaken down and idiot proof.
Oh,
On 7-Jun-07, at 6:28 PM, Frank Cusack wrote:
On June 7, 2007 6:21:34 PM -0300 Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In general, IMHO this will be good for ZFS: Apple won't ship until
it's
shaken down and idiot proof.
Oh, I dunno. Apple ships a lot of buggy stuff.
Not at this level. Rem
On June 7, 2007 6:21:34 PM -0300 Toby Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In general, IMHO this will be good for ZFS: Apple won't ship until it's
shaken down and idiot proof.
Oh, I dunno. Apple ships a lot of buggy stuff.
I expect this will result in substantial
quality feedback and patches fro
On 7-Jun-07, at 4:53 PM, Lee Fyock wrote:
Thanks, Chad.
There's some debate in the Mac community about what the phrase "the
file system in Mac OS X" means. Does that mean that machines that
ship with Leopard will run on ZFS discs by default? Will ZFS be the
default file system when initi
Thanks, Chad.
There's some debate in the Mac community about what the phrase "the
file system in Mac OS X" means. Does that mean that machines that
ship with Leopard will run on ZFS discs by default? Will ZFS be the
default file system when initializing a new drive?
IMHO, that seems unlik
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
From Macintouch (http://macintouch.com/#other.2007.06.07):
---
On stage Wednesday in Washington D.C., Sun Microsystems Inc. CEO
Jonathan Schwartz revealed that his company's open-source ZFS file
system will replace Apple's long-used HFS+ in Ma
17 matches
Mail list logo
