Kava schrieb:
> My 2 cents ... read somewhere that you should not be running LVM on top of
> ZFS ... something about additional overhead.
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
My 2 cents ... read somewhere that you should not be running LVM on top of ZFS
... something about additional overhead.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mail
Thiago Sobral schrieb:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thomas Maier-Komor escreveu:
>> Thiago Sobral schrieb:
>>>
>>> I need to manage volumes like LVM does on Linux or AIX, and I think
>>> that ZFS can solve this issue.
>>>
>>> I read the SVM specification and certainly it doesn't will be the
>>> solution that
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5461
On Jan 21, 2008 5:09 PM, Thiago Sobral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to manage volumes like LVM does on Linux or AIX, and I think that
> ZFS can solve this issue.
>
> I read the SVM specification and certainly it doesn't will be the
> s
Hey Thiago,
SVM is a direct replacement for LVM. Also, you'll notice about a 30%
performance boost if you move from LVM to SVM. At least we did when we
moved a couple of years ago.
-J
On Jan 21, 2008 8:09 AM, Thiago Sobral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to manage volumes like
Thiago Sobral wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to manage volumes like LVM does on Linux or AIX, and I think that
> ZFS can solve this issue.
>
> I read the SVM specification and certainly it doesn't will be the
> solution that I'll adopt. I don't have Veritas here.
Specifically what is SVM missin
Thiago Sobral schrieb:
> Hi folks,
>
> I need to manage volumes like LVM does on Linux or AIX, and I think that
> ZFS can solve this issue.
>
> I read the SVM specification and certainly it doesn't will be the
> solution that I'll adopt. I don't have Veritas here.
>
Why do you think it doesn'
