On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
On Thu 2011-12-22 (10:09), Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
One of your disks failed to return a sector. Due to redundancy, the
original data was recreated from the remaining disks. This is normal
good behavior (other than the disk failing to read the sector).
On Thu 2011-12-22 (09:13), Richard Elling wrote:
> Be happy. Dance a jig. Buy a lottery ticket.
> Notice: scrub repaired 85.5K in 1h21m with 0 errors on Mon Dec 19 06:24:25
> 2011
> ZFS found corruption and fixed it.
lol, will do next time.
> oops... tempting the fates?
> Transient errors do occ
On Thu 2011-12-22 (10:09), Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> One of your disks failed to return a sector. Due to redundancy, the
> original data was recreated from the remaining disks. This is normal
> good behavior (other than the disk failing to read the sector).
So those checksum counts were histori
On Dec 21, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
> Hi guys, after a scrub my raidz array status showed:
>
> # zpool status
> pool: pool
> state: ONLINE
> status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
>attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are u
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
I assume the checksum counts are current and irreconcilable. (Why does
the scan say 'repaired with 0 errors' then?).
One of your disks failed to return a sector. Due to redundancy, the
original data was recreated from the remaining disks. This is n
