Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for boot partition layout in ZFS

2011-04-06 Thread sanjay nadkarni
On 04/ 6/11 01:05 PM, Richard Elling wrote: On Apr 6, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Linder, Doug wrote: Torrey Minton wrote: I'm sure someone has a really good reason to keep /var separated but those cases are fewer and> far between than I saw 10 years ago. I agree that the causes and repercussions a

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for boot partition layout in ZFS

2011-04-06 Thread Richard Elling
On Apr 6, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Linder, Doug wrote: > Torrey Minton wrote: > >> I'm sure someone has a really good reason to keep /var separated but those >> cases are fewer and > far between than I saw 10 years ago. > > I agree that the causes and repercussions are less now than they were a long

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for boot partition layout in ZFS

2011-04-06 Thread Linder, Doug
Torrey Minton wrote: > I'm sure someone has a really good reason to keep /var separated but those > cases are fewer and > far between than I saw 10 years ago. I agree that the causes and repercussions are less now than they were a long time ago. But /var still can and sometimes does fill up, a

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for boot partition layout in ZFS

2011-04-06 Thread David Magda
On Wed, April 6, 2011 11:29, Gary Mills wrote: > People forget (c), the ability to set different filesystem options on > /var. You might want to have `setuid=off' for improved security, for > example. Or better yet: exec=off,devices=off. Another handy one could be "compression=on" (or a even "gz

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for boot partition layout in ZFS

2011-04-06 Thread Torrey McMahon
On 4/6/2011 11:08 AM, Erik Trimble wrote: Traditionally, the reason for a separate /var was one of two major items: (a) /var was writable, and / wasn't - this was typical of diskless or minimal local-disk configurations. Modern packaging systems are making this kind of configuration increasi

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for boot partition layout in ZFS

2011-04-06 Thread Gary Mills
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:08:06AM -0700, Erik Trimble wrote: >On 4/6/2011 7:50 AM, Lori Alt wrote: >On 04/ 6/11 07:59 AM, Arjun YK wrote: > >I'm not sure there's a defined "best practice". Maybe someone else >can answer that question. My guess is that in environments where,

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for boot partition layout in ZFS

2011-04-06 Thread Erik Trimble
On 4/6/2011 7:50 AM, Lori Alt wrote: On 04/ 6/11 07:59 AM, Arjun YK wrote: Hi, I am trying to use ZFS for boot, and kind of confused about how the boot paritions like /var to be layed out. With old UFS, we create /var as sepearate filesystem to avoid various logs filling up the / filesystem

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best practice for boot partition layout in ZFS

2011-04-06 Thread Lori Alt
On 04/ 6/11 07:59 AM, Arjun YK wrote: Hi, I am trying to use ZFS for boot, and kind of confused about how the boot paritions like /var to be layed out. With old UFS, we create /var as sepearate filesystem to avoid various logs filling up the / filesystem I believe that creating /var as a