> > The system became non-responsible after two drives was lost, and
> > replaced with spares, in that VDEV. That bug has been filed and
> > acknowleged. Take a RAIDz2 with two spares and remove a drive from
> > the pool, let it resilver to a spare, remove another, wait until it
> > resilvers again
> > Shouldn't ZFS detach these automatically? It has done so earlier...
> It is not supposed to- at least that I recall.
Earlier replaces have gone well. One thing is spares, which I can understand
somewhat, but dead drives should definetely be tossed off when replaced
Vennlige hilsener / Best r
> Two drives have been resilvered, but the old drives still stick. The drive
> that has died still hasn't been taken over by a spare, although the two
> spares show up as AVAIL.
For the one that hasn't been replaced try doing:
zpool replace dbpool c8t24d0 c4t43d0
For the two that have already be
