On September 15, 2006 3:49:14 PM -0700 "can you guess?"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(I looked at my email before checking here, so I'll just cut-and-paste
the email response in here rather than send it. By the way, is there a
way to view just the responses that have accumulated in this forum sinc
Celso wrote:
a couple of points
One could make the argument that the feature could
cause enough
confusion to not warrant its inclusion. If I'm a
typical user and I
write a file to the filesystem where the admin set
three copies but
didn't tell me it might throw me into a tizzy trying
to f
On 12/09/06, Celso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of the great things about zfs, is that it protects not just against
mechanical failure, but against silent data corruption. Having this available
to laptop owners seems to me to be important to making zfs even more attractive.
I'm not arguing
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Anton B. Rang wrote:
reformatted
> >True - I'm a laptop user myself. But as I said, I'd assume the whole disk
> >would fail (it does in my experience).
Usually a laptop disk suffers a mechanical failure - and the failure rate
is a lot higher than disks in a fixed lo
Anton B. Rang wrote:
The biggest problem I see with this is one of observability, if not all
of the data is encrypted yet what should the encryption property say ?
If it says encryption is on then the admin might think the data is
"safe", but if it says it is off that isn't the truth either bec
