On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:57:08PM -0800, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
Hi Bill! :-)
> On 01/27/10 21:17, Daniel Carosone wrote:
>> This is as expected. Not expected is that:
>>
>> usedbyrefreservation = refreservation
>>
>> I would expect this to be 0, since all the reserved space has been
>> alloca
On 01/27/10 21:17, Daniel Carosone wrote:
This is as expected. Not expected is that:
usedbyrefreservation = refreservation
I would expect this to be 0, since all the reserved space has been
allocated.
This would be the case if the volume had no snapshots.
As a result, used is over twice
In a thread elsewhere, trying to analyse why the zfs auto-snapshot
cleanup code was cleaning up more aggressively than expected, I
discovered some interesting properties of a zvol.
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-auto-snapshot/2010-January/000232.html
The zvol is not thin-provisioned.
