> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of bear
>
> [b]Short Version[/b]
> I used zpool add instead of zpool replace while trying to move drives
> from an si3124 controller card. I can backup the data to other drives
> and destroy the
[b]Short Version[/b]
I used zpool add instead of zpool replace while trying to move drives from an
si3124 controller card. I can backup the data to other drives and destroy the
pool, but would prefer not to since it involved around 4 tb of data and will
take forever.
[b]zpool add mypool c4t2d0[
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Brian Lionberger wrote:
> The question is, should I create one zpool or two to hold /export/home
> and /export/backup?
> Currently I have one pool for /export/home and one pool for /export/backup.
>
> Should it be on pool for both??? Would this be better and why?
One thing to
I have a zpool issue that I need to discuss.
My application is going to run on a 3120 with 4 disks. Two(mirrored)
disks will represent /export/home and the other two(mirrored) will be
/export/backup.
The question is, should I create one zpool or two to hold /export/home
and /export/backup?
Cur
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 21:18 -0700, Brian Lionberger wrote:
> I have a zpool issue that I need to discuss.
>
> My application is going to run on a 3120 with 4 disks. Two(mirrored)
> disks will represent /export/home and the other two(mirrored) will be
> /export/backup.
>
> The question is, shou
Krzys wrote:
> hello folks, I am running Solaris 10 U3 and I have small problem that I dont
> know how to fix...
>
> I had a pool of two drives:
>
> bash-3.00# zpool status
>pool: mypool
> state: ONLINE
> scrub: none requested
> config:
>
> NAME STATE READ WRITE CK
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
> I'm curious if the capacity of this pool is 128mb x 3? If so, then I
> think you could replace the emcpower2a with a 128mb file.
That's a great idea. You could do it even if the other two aren't 128mb -
you can always replace a device/file as long
Cindy Swearingen wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I agree that your best bet is to replace the 128-mb device with
> another device, fix the emcpower2a manually, and then replace it
> back. I don't know these drives at all, so I'm unclear about the
> fix it manually step.
>
> Because your pool isn't redundant,
Chris,
I agree that your best bet is to replace the 128-mb device with
another device, fix the emcpower2a manually, and then replace it
back. I don't know these drives at all, so I'm unclear about the
fix it manually step.
Because your pool isn't redundant, you can't use zpool offline
or detach.
yes, I was thinking about this but I wanted to just remove the whole 128mb disk
and then use format to repartition this complete disk to give it full
capacity... I have all the disks setup this way so I wanted to be consistent
with it but its not letting remove that disk at all from the pool...1
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Krzys wrote:
>
> everything is great but I've made a mistake and I would like to remove
> emcpower2a from my pool and I cannot do that...
>
> Well the mistake that I made is that I did not format my device
> correctly so instead of adding 125gig I added 128meg
You can't remo
hello folks, I am running Solaris 10 U3 and I have small problem that I dont
know how to fix...
I had a pool of two drives:
bash-3.00# zpool status
pool: mypool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
mypoolONLINE
Hello Krzys,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 5:14:06 PM, you wrote:
K> Awesome, thanks for your help, will there be any way to convert raidz to
K> raidz2?
No, at there's no such tool right now.
--
Best regards,
Robertmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Awesome, thanks for your help, will there be any way to convert raidz to
raidz2?
Thanks again for help/
Chris
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Krzys,
Sunday, October 22, 2006, 8:42:06 PM, you wrote:
K> I have solaris 10 U2 and I have raidz partition setup on 5 disks, I ju
Hello Krzys,
Sunday, October 22, 2006, 8:42:06 PM, you wrote:
K> I have solaris 10 U2 and I have raidz partition setup on 5 disks, I just
added a
K> new disk and was wondering, can I add another disk to raidz? I was able to
add
K> it to a pool but I do not think it added it to zpool.
You can't
I have solaris 10 U2 and I have raidz partition setup on 5 disks, I just added a
new disk and was wondering, can I add another disk to raidz? I was able to add
it to a pool but I do not think it added it to zpool.
[13:38:41] /root > zpool status -v mypool2
pool: mypool2
state: ONLINE
scru
16 matches
Mail list logo