Actually, I think it's smaller companies and home users who want this most.
Sun target enterprises with their storage kit which tends to be servers that
are fully populated with drives. Look at the thumper for example - a 4U server
that already comes with 48 drives. You're not going to be add
I have only one question: why? ZFS is a great filesystem, but, why we
can't shrink a zpool? This is a very important feature to ZFS adoption
in enterprises, or not? Is it at least a planned feature?
Thanks,
Joel
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Daniel wrote:
> Cindy,
>
> This is helpful! Thank
Cindy,
This is helpful! Thank you very much :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Daniel,
You can replace the disks in both of the supported root pool
configurations:
- single disk (non-redundant) root pool
- mirrored (redundant) root pool
I've tried both recently and I prefer attaching the replacement disk to
the single-disk root pool and then detaching the old disk, using
Is it possible to do a replace on / as well?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Is it possible to do a replace on the root filesystem as well?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> It is unfortunately that you ask this question after
> you've installed the
> new disks; now both the old and the new disks are
> part of the same zpool.
That's awesome, I did not know that this would work. I'm glad I made this post.
I actually have not yet replaced any drive, in fact, this ve
>I'm using zfs not to have access to a fail-safe backed up system, but to easily
>manage my file system. I would like to be able to, as I buy new harddrives,
>just
>to be able to replace the old ones. I'm very environmentally concious, so I
>don't want to leave old drives in there to consume pow
Err... you can't remove drives that are in use, but for what you're describing
can't you just use zfs replace and then remove the old drive?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail
tcook,
Thanks for your response. Well, I don't imagine there would be a lot of
requests from enterprise customers with deep pockets. My impression has been
that OS is targetting the little guy though, and as such, this would really be
a welcome feature.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Daniel wrote:
> I'm using zfs not to have access to a fail-safe backed up system, but to
> easily manage my file system. I would like to be able to, as I buy new
> harddrives, just to be able to replace the old ones. I'm very
> environmentally concious, so I don'
I'm using zfs not to have access to a fail-safe backed up system, but to easily
manage my file system. I would like to be able to, as I buy new harddrives,
just to be able to replace the old ones. I'm very environmentally concious, so
I don't want to leave old drives in there to consume power a
12 matches
Mail list logo
