On Oct 27, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Kei Saito wrote:
> Hi!
>
> i'm interested in zil's behavior.
Start here:
http://blogs.sun.com/perrin/entry/the_lumberjack
>
> it's my understanding that zil is used only when
> synchronous(o_sync,o_dsync & directio) write io request.
> then zil have written content
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi!
i'm interested in zil's behavior.
it's my understanding that zil is used only when
synchronous(o_sync,o_dsync & directio) write io request.
then zil have written contents that system call is used by zil replay
when used by crashed.
is this correct?
It seems a large amount of io for system cal
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Steven Stallion
>
> I had a question regarding how the ZIL interacts with zpool import:
>
> Given that the intent log is replayed in the event of a system failure,
> does the replay behavior d
On 05/05/2010 20:45, Steven Stallion wrote:
All,
I had a question regarding how the ZIL interacts with zpool import:
Given that the intent log is replayed in the event of a system failure,
does the replay behavior differ if -f is passed to zpool import? For
example, if I have a system which fai
All,
I had a question regarding how the ZIL interacts with zpool import:
Given that the intent log is replayed in the event of a system failure,
does the replay behavior differ if -f is passed to zpool import? For
example, if I have a system which fails prior to completing a series of
writes and
