> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
>
> I am trying to duplicate a filesystem from one zpool to another zpool.
> I don't care so much about snapshots on the destination side...I am
> more trying to duplicate how RSYNC would copy a filesystem, and then
> only copy incre
I am trying to duplicate a filesystem from one zpool to another zpool. I
don't care so much about snapshots on the destination side...I am more
trying to duplicate how RSYNC would copy a filesystem, and then only copy
incrementals from the source side to the destination side in subsequent runs
unt
Krzys wrote:
It does not work, I did try to remove every snap and I ended destroying
that pool all together and had to resend it all.. My goal is to use zfs
send/receive for backup purposes to big storage system that I have, and
keep snaps, I dont care if file system is mounted or not but I wan
It does not work, I did try to remove every snap and I ended destroying that
pool all together and had to resend it all.. My goal is to use zfs send/receive
for backup purposes to big storage system that I have, and keep snaps, I dont
care if file system is mounted or not but I want to have abil
Hi,
Krzys wrote:
> Ok, so -F option is not in U3, is there any way to replicate file system
> and not be able to mount it automatically? so when I do zfs send/receive
> it wont be mounted and changes would not be made so that further
> replications could be possible? What I did notice was that if
Ok, so -F option is not in U3, is there any way to replicate file system and not
be able to mount it automatically? so when I do zfs send/receive it wont be
mounted and changes would not be made so that further replications could be
possible? What I did notice was that if I am doing zfs send/rec
Chris,
This option will be available in the upcoming Solaris 10 release, a
few months from now.
We'll send out a listing of the new ZFS features around that time.
Cindy
Krzys wrote:
Ah, ok, not a problem, do you know Cindy when next Solaris Update is
going to be released by SUN? Yes, I am run
On 16/04/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, ok, not a problem, do you know Cindy when next Solaris Update is going to be
released by SUN? Yes, I am running U3 at this moment.
Summer is what I last read (July?).
--
"Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright
Shawn Walk
Ah, ok, not a problem, do you know Cindy when next Solaris Update is going to be
released by SUN? Yes, I am running U3 at this moment.
Regards,
Chris
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
Looks like you're not running a Solaris release that contains
the zfs receive -F option.
Chris,
Looks like you're not running a Solaris release that contains
the zfs receive -F option. This option is in current Solaris community
release, build 48.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-2271/6mhupg6f1?a=view#gdsup
Otherwise, you'll have to wait until an upcoming Solaris 10 release.
C
[18:19:00] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /root > zfs send -i mypool/[EMAIL PROTECTED] mypool/[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
zfs receive -F mypool2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
invalid option 'F'
usage:
receive [-vn]
receive [-vn] -d
For the property list, run: zfs set|get
It does not seem to work unless I am
On 4/17/07, Krzys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
and when I did try to run that last command I got the following error:
[16:26:00] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /root > zfs send -i mypool/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mypool/[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
zfs receive mypool2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cannot receive: destination has been mo
Hello folks, I have a question and a small problem... I did try to replicate my
zfs with all the snaps, so I did run few commands:
time zfs send mypool/[EMAIL PROTECTED] | zfs receive mypool2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
real6h35m12.34s
user0m0.00s
sys 29m32.28s
zfs send -i mypool/[EMAIL PR
13 matches
Mail list logo
