Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS resilvering loop from hell

2011-07-27 Thread Daniel Carosone
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 08:00:43PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Charles Stephens wrote: > >> I'm on S11E 150.0.1.9 and I replaced one of the drives and the pool >> seems to be stuck in a resilvering loop. I performed a 'zpool clear' >> and 'zpool scrub' and just complain

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS resilvering loop from hell

2011-07-27 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Charles Stephens wrote: I'm on S11E 150.0.1.9 and I replaced one of the drives and the pool seems to be stuck in a resilvering loop. I performed a 'zpool clear' and 'zpool scrub' and just complains that the drives I didn't replace are degraded because of too many errors.

[zfs-discuss] ZFS resilvering loop from hell

2011-07-26 Thread Charles Stephens
I'm on S11E 150.0.1.9 and I replaced one of the drives and the pool seems to be stuck in a resilvering loop. I performed a 'zpool clear' and 'zpool scrub' and just complains that the drives I didn't replace are degraded because of too many errors. Oddly the replaced drive is reported as being

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

2008-09-29 Thread Mikael Kjerrman
Richard, thanks alot for that answer. It can be argued back and forth what is right, but it helps knowing the reason behind the problem. Again, thanks alot... //Mike -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@o

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

2008-09-29 Thread Mikael Kjerrman
Hi, it was actually shared both as a dataset and a NFS-share. we had zonedata/prodlogs set up as a dataset and then we had zonedata/tmp mounted as a NFS filesystem within the zone. //Mike -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mail

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

2008-09-28 Thread Richard Elling
Johan Hartzenberg wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Richard Elling > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Mikael Kjerrman wrote: > > define a lot :-) > > > > We are doing about 7-8M per second which I don't think is a lot > but perhaps it is eno

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

2008-09-27 Thread Ian Collins
Mikael Kjerrman wrote: > > I also have a question about sharing a zfs from the global zone to a local > zone. Are there any issues with this? We had an unfortunate sysadmin who did > this and our systems hung. We have no logs that show anyhing at all, but I > thought I'd ask just be sure. > >

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

2008-09-27 Thread Johan Hartzenberg
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Mikael Kjerrman wrote: > > define a lot :-) > > > > We are doing about 7-8M per second which I don't think is a lot but > perhaps it is enough to screw up the estimates? Anyhow the resilvering > completed about 4386h earli

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

2008-09-26 Thread Richard Elling
Mikael Kjerrman wrote: > define a lot :-) > > We are doing about 7-8M per second which I don't think is a lot but perhaps > it is enough to screw up the estimates? Anyhow the resilvering completed > about 4386h earlier than expected so everything is ok now, but I still feel > that the way it fig

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

2008-09-26 Thread Johan Hartzenberg
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:02 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Note the progress so far "0.04%." In my experience the time estimate has > no basis in reality until it's about 1% do or so. I think there is some > bookkeeping or something ZFS does at the start of a scrub or resilver that > throws

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

2008-09-26 Thread jonathan
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Mikael Kjerrman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] >> this box was rebooted this morning and after the boot I noticed a >> resilver was in progress. But the suggested time seemed a bit long, so >> is this a problem which can be patched or remediated in another wa

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

2008-09-26 Thread Mikael Kjerrman
define a lot :-) We are doing about 7-8M per second which I don't think is a lot but perhaps it is enough to screw up the estimates? Anyhow the resilvering completed about 4386h earlier than expected so everything is ok now, but I still feel that the way it figures out the number is wrong. Any

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

2008-09-26 Thread Brent Jones
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Mikael Kjerrman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've searched without luck, so I'm asking instead. > > I have a Solaris 10 box, > > # cat /etc/release > Solaris 10 11/06 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC > Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc.

[zfs-discuss] zfs resilvering

2008-09-26 Thread Mikael Kjerrman
Hi, I've searched without luck, so I'm asking instead. I have a Solaris 10 box, # cat /etc/release Solaris 10 11/06 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms.