Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] zfs / nfs issue (not performance :-) with courier-imap

2007-01-25 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Ben, Thursday, January 25, 2007, 9:02:53 PM, you wrote: BR> I completely agree with Robert. I'd personally suggest 'truss' to start BR> because its trivial to use, then start using DTrace to further hone down BR> the problem. I would argue that truss is simpler than dtrace in that case,

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs / nfs issue (not performance :-) with courier-imap

2007-01-25 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
On Jan 25, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Ben Rockwood wrote: Robert Milkowski wrote: CLSNL> but if I click, say E, it has F's contents, F has Gs contents, and no CLSNL> mail has D's contents that I can see. But the list in the mail CLSNL> client list view is correct. I don't belive it's a problem wi

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs / nfs issue (not performance :-) with courier-imap

2007-01-25 Thread Ben Rockwood
Robert Milkowski wrote: CLSNL> but if I click, say E, it has F's contents, F has Gs contents, and no CLSNL> mail has D's contents that I can see. But the list in the mail CLSNL> client list view is correct. I don't belive it's a problem with nfs/zfs server. Please try with simple dtrace script

Re: [zfs-discuss] zfs / nfs issue (not performance :-) with courier-imap

2007-01-25 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Chad, Thursday, January 25, 2007, 9:14:24 AM, you wrote: CLSNL> I am not sure if this is a zfs issue, and nfs issue, or a combination CLSNL> of the two, or not an issue with them per se (caching or whatever), CLSNL> or a courier-imap issue, or even a mail client issue. CLSNL> However, th

[zfs-discuss] zfs / nfs issue (not performance :-) with courier-imap

2007-01-25 Thread Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
I am not sure if this is a zfs issue, and nfs issue, or a combination of the two, or not an issue with them per se (caching or whatever), or a courier-imap issue, or even a mail client issue. However, the issue happens in at least two different unrelated mail clients, so I don't think it is